Research on Evaluation of the Landscape and its Functions in Houtan Park of the World Exposition 2010 Shanghai, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction of urban waterscape parks based on ecological concepts and functions is becoming the tendency of modern urban parks. Unfortunately, there are no suitable evaluation systems for these parks. This study establishes a comprehensive evaluation system for a landscape and its functions via the analytic hierarchy process and the comprehensive index method. The evaluation model consisted of 3 evaluation indexes and 23 evaluation indicators relevant to the landscape characteristics of Houtan Park of the World Exposition 2010 Shanghai, China. The evaluation indicators were monitored from 2006 to 2010, and the results of the investigation led to the following conclusions: the park fulfills a range of desirable functions, and ranks high in aesthetic, economic and societal values; ecological functions were applied well within the landscape, and following ecological restoration and the construction of a functional aquatic ecosystem, the water quality of Houtan River has been continuously purified from inferior class V~ class V to class III~ class I range, while the heavy metals in the sediment were improved from inferior class V~ class V to class I; the biodiversity was improved from 0.72 into 1.49; and the results for other indicators were improved overall. In general, the comprehensive score of the evaluation increased from 1.227 to 4.341. Although minor problems remain to be solved, the results indicate that the design concept and construction methods applied in Houtan Park are well applicable to sustainable landscapes, and the evaluation system as a whole can be extended and applied in similar cases.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

4061-4073

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Daniel, T. C., Vining, J. (1983). Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality. New York, NY: Springer.

Google Scholar

[2] Daniel, T. H., Curtis, M. E., Anne, C. N., et al. (2000). A landscape ecology assessment of the Tensas River Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64 (1), 41- 54.

Google Scholar

[3] Cassatella, C. (2011). Assessing Visual and Social Perceptions of Landscape. New York, NY: Springer.

Google Scholar

[4] Farina, A. ( 2006). Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology toward a Science of Landscape. New York, NY: Springer.

Google Scholar

[5] He, S. J., Liao, C. F., Yang, Y. X., et al. (2008). Landscape ecological evaluation on the artificial forest of Leucaena leucocephala: taking the example of Xiaokua Hill of Yuanmou. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 13(3):285-290.

DOI: 10.1007/s11859-008-0305-z

Google Scholar

[6] Voghera, A. (2011). Land Use Indicators for Landscape Assessment. New York, NY: Springer.

Google Scholar

[7] Opdam, P., Verboom, J., Pouwels, R. (2003). Landscape cohesion: An index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 18(2), 113-126.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024429715253

Google Scholar

[8] Jolande, W. T., Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24(8), 1037-1052.

DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8

Google Scholar

[9] Hasenauer, H., Putzhuber, F. (2010). Deriving sustainability measures using statistical data: A case study from the Eisenwurzen. Austria. Ecol. Indicators, 10: 32–38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.019

Google Scholar

[10] Gomez-Sal, A., Belmontes, J.A., Nicolau, J.M. (2003). Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecol. Model. 168 (3), 319–341.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(03)00144-3

Google Scholar

[11] Benini, L., Bandini, V., Marazza, D., Contin, A. ( 2010). Assessment of land use changes through an indicator-based approach: a case study from the Lamone River basin in Northern Italy. Ecol. Indicators, 10, 4- 14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.016

Google Scholar

[12] Andree, B., Steve, C., Jules, E., et al. (2005). Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 74(3), 217-237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.017

Google Scholar

[13] Uta Steinhardt. (1998). Applying the fuzzy set theory for medium and small scale landscape assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 203-208.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00059-0

Google Scholar

[14] Bureau of Shanghai World Expo Coordination., Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau. (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] Zhang, Y. J., Luo, K., Huang, W., et al. (2007). Preliminary analysis on vegetation characteristics of the Houtan Wetland in Shanghai World Expo Zone. Acta Agriculture Shanghai. 23 (3), 14-21.

Google Scholar

[16] State Environmental Protection Administration. (2002). Environmental quality standards for surface water (GB3838–2002).

Google Scholar

[17] Yu,K.J., Turenscape. (2010). 2010 Shanghai Expo—the Houtan Park. Beijing, CHN: China Architecture and Building Press.

Google Scholar

[18] Saaty,T. L. (1977). A sealing method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal Mathematical Psychology, 15: 234-281.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Google Scholar

[19] Li, Z. Y., Ding, J., et al. (2004). The Principles and Methods of Environmental Quality Assessment. Beijing, CHN: Chemical Industry Press.

Google Scholar

[20] Luo, L. C., Yang, D. L., Ma, J. (2008). Fuzzy synthesis evaluation research on urban wetland park based on AHP. Science- Technology and Management, 10(4), 18-22.

Google Scholar

[21] State Environmental Protection Administration. (1999)Water quality-Guidance on sampling techniques of rivers (HJ/T 52-1999).

Google Scholar

[22] State Environmental Protection Administration, State Bureau of Technical Supervision. (1995). Environmental Quality Standard for Soil (GB15618~1995).

Google Scholar

[23] Zhu, H. R. (1991). The Journal of Chinese Freshwater Algae: Chroococcophyceae (Vol. 7). Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[24] Shi, Z. X. (1994). The Journal of Chinese Freshwater Algae: Euglenophyta (Vol. 6). Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[25] Qi, Y. Z., Li, J. Y., Xie, S. Q. (2004) The Journal of Chinese Freshwater Algae: Bacillariophyta, Pennatae (Vol. 10). Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[26] Kamenir, Y., Dubinsky, Z., Zohary, T. (2004). Phytoplankton size structure stability in a meso - eutrophic subtropical lake. NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

DOI: 10.1023/b:hydr.0000027729.53348.c7

Google Scholar

[27] Zhang, Z. S., Huang, X. F. (1991). The Research Methods for Limnoplankton. Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[28] Han, M. S., Shu, Y. F. (1995). Chinese Freshwater Biology Atlas. Beijing, CHN: Ocean Press.

Google Scholar

[29] Zhang, C. (2002). The Course of Environment Assessment. Beijing, CHN: China Environmental Science Press.

Google Scholar

[30] Ma, Q. G. (2010). Brief estimation model for construction investment of wastewater treatment plant. Chemical Industry, 28, 31-34.

Google Scholar

[31] Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Planning and Land Resources [DB/OL]. (2003). Available at: http: /www. shgtj. gov. cn/tdgl/200812/t20081223_152686. htm.

Google Scholar

[32] Bureau of Shanghai World Expo Coordination. (2010) . The EXPO Green Land: The EXPO Operation Festschrift from Shanghai World EXPO Bureau.

DOI: 10.5353/th_b4167991

Google Scholar

[33] Muiier, G. (1979). Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geojoural, 2: 108.

Google Scholar

[34] Log of the Shanghai Environmental Protection Editorial Board. (1998). Log of the Shanghai Environmental Protection. Shanghai, CHN: Shanghai academy of social science press.

Google Scholar

[35] Wang, X. M., Wang, T. H., et al. (2008). The Research of Urban Regional Ecological Elements and the Construction of Information Data Base: taking Shanghai EXPO as an example. Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[36] Wang, R. J., Zhang, J. C., Jiang, S. (2011). Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in Shijiu Lake, China Forestry Science and Technology, 2, 70-74.

Google Scholar

[37] Lu, Y., Liu, X. D. (2010). Assessment of Scenic Forest Landscape Quality in Taihu Lake Source Forest Park. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci. 38(1), 480- 482.

Google Scholar

[38] Meng, W. (2008). The Research for the evaluation of regional landscape ecology quality. Beijing, CHN: Science Press.

Google Scholar

[39] Jia J.M., Hao, X. H. (2010). Study on Index Evaluation System of Wetland Biodiversity. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 49: 1877-1879.

Google Scholar

[40] Yang, F., Zeng,G. M, et al. (2008). Research on the Uncertainty of the Assessment Index System of Urban River Ecosystem Health. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences). 35, 63-66.

Google Scholar

[41] Grace K. L. Lee, Edwin H. W. Chan. ( 2008). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals. Social Indicators Research. 89: 155–168.

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-007-9228-x

Google Scholar

[42] Simone Bastianoni, Nadia Marchettini. (1997). Emergy/ Exergy ratio as a measure of level of organization of system. Ecological Modelling, 99, 33-401.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(96)01920-5

Google Scholar