Process Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Pectin from Helianthus annuus L. Heads by Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

An ultrasound-assisted procedure for the extraction of pectin from heads of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower) was established. A Box–Behnken design (BBD) was employed to optimize the extraction temperature (X1: 30–50°C), extraction time (X2: 20–40 min) and pH (X3: 2.5–3.5) to obtain a high yield of pectin with high degree of esterification (DE) from sunflower heads. Analysis of variance showed that the contribution of a quadratic model was significant for the pectin extraction yield and DE. An optimization study using response surface methodology was performed and 3D response surfaces were plotted from the mathematical model. According to the RSM model, the highest pectin yield (23.11 ± 0.08%) and DE (39.85 ± 0.14%) can be achieved when the UAE process is carried out at 50°C for 40min using a hydrochloric acid solution of pH 3.0. These results suggest that ultrasound-assisted extraction could be a good option for the extraction of functional pectin from sunflower heads at industrial level.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

848-854

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Pickardt, C., Neidhart, S., Griesbach, C. Food Hydrocolloids, Vol. 23, (2009), p. (1966).

Google Scholar

[2] Liu Qing, Shi Jianfang, Zhao Wei. Transactions of the CSAE, Vol. 27(Supp. 2) (2011), p.336.

Google Scholar

[3] AN Yu-lin, SUN Rui-fen , FENG Wan-yu. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, Vol. 21, (2006), p.1.

Google Scholar

[4] Chang, K. C., Dhurandhar, N., You, X., Miyamoto, A. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 59(3), (1994), p.602.

Google Scholar

[5] Thakur BR, Singh RK, Handa AK. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, Vol. 37(1997), p.47.

Google Scholar

[6] Smit, C. J. B., Brayant, E. F. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 32 (1967), p.197.

Google Scholar

[7] Chang, K. C., Dhurandhar, N., You, X., Miyamoto, A. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 59(6) (1994), p.1207.

Google Scholar

[8] Bagherian, H., Ashtiani, F. Z., Fouladitajar, A. Chemical Engineering and Processing, Vol. 50, (2011), p . 1237.

Google Scholar

[9] Panchev, I. N., Kirtchev, N. A., & Kratchanov, C. G. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, Vol. 23, (1988), p.337.

Google Scholar

[10] Vinatoru, M. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 8, (2001), p.303.

Google Scholar

[11] Kim, W. J., Sosulski, F. W., Campbell, S. J. Food Science, Vol. 43, (1978), p.746.

Google Scholar

[12] Kim, W. J., Sosulski, F. W., Lee, C. K. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 43, (1978), p.1436.

Google Scholar

[13] Pappas, C. S., Malovikova, A., Hromadkova, Z. Car-bohydrate Polymers, Vol. 56, (2004), p.465.

Google Scholar

[14] Manrique, G. D., Lajolo, F. M. Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 25, (2002), p.99.

Google Scholar

[15] Box, G. E. P., & Behnken, D. W. Chemical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 2, (1960), p.455.

Google Scholar

[16] Gan, C.Y., Latiff, A. A. Carbohydrate Polymers, Vol. 83, (2011), p.600.

Google Scholar