Research on Comprehensive Assessment Index System for Transmission Network Planning Alternatives

Article Preview

Abstract:

In view of the lack of comprehensive and quantitative evaluation means for transmission network planning currently, a comprehensive assessment index system adapted to the characteristics of the transmission network planning is proposed, including 6 strategic layer indices (safety and reliability, economic efficiency, flexibility and coordination, smart and green, controllable risk and social benefits), 16 target layer indices and 57 operating layer indices. And the assessment standard for each index is determined to provide objective, comprehensive and systematic evaluation of transmission network planning alternatives as well as prepare for realization of the comprehensive evaluation of transmission network planning.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 960-961)

Pages:

1567-1574

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] XIAO Jun, CUI Yanyan, WANG Jianmin, et al. A hierarchical performance assessment method on the distribution network planning[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2008, 32(15): 36-40.

DOI: 10.1109/drpt.2008.4523598

Google Scholar

[2] LUO Dong, HU Lianghuan, XING Yuzhen. Investigation of assessment systems for operation of power grids[J]. Anhui Electric Power, 2009, 26(3): 75-78.

Google Scholar

[3] WANG Wei, WANG Chun, CHENG Hong, ZHAO Yan. Preliminary frame of index system for evaluating power network[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2008, 36(24): 14-18.

Google Scholar

[4] ZHANG Jian, PU Tianjiao, WANG Wei, et al. A comprehensive assessment index system for smart grid demonstration projects[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(6): 5-9.

Google Scholar

[5] WANG Jingmin, SHI Ting. Construction of evaluation index system for smart grid[J]. East China Electric Power, 2012, 40(2): 193-197.

Google Scholar

[6] YANG Lijun, WANG Shuo, LU Zhigang. Indices of distribution network intelligent planning evaluation[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(12): 83-87.

Google Scholar

[7] SUN Qiang, GE Xubo, LIU Lin, et al. Review of smart grid comprehensive assessment systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2011, 23(6): 105-110.

Google Scholar

[8] LI Yulong. Application and research on comprehensive assessment modeling method for alternative transmission network planning[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] LIU Yali. Comprehensive evaluation and decision-making for transmission network planning alternatives based on DEAHP method[D]. Jinan, Shandong Province: Shandong University, (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] CUI Yanyan. Study and application of comprehensive evaluation method for network planning[D]. Tianjing: Tianjing University, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] WANG Qin, WEN Fushuan, LIU Min, YI Su. Combined use of fuzzy set theory and analytic hierarchy process for comprehensive assessment of electricity markets[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(7): 32-37.

Google Scholar

[12] LIN Jikeng, LI Tongfei, ZHAO Ziming. Assessment on power system black-start schemes based on entropy-weighted fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(2): 115-120.

Google Scholar

[13] SUN Xiu dong, LlZong bin, CHEN Fumin. Research on multiple attribute synthetic evaluation methods based on artificial neural network[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry (Natural science), 2003, 18(2): 11-14.

Google Scholar