An Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of Carbon Tax Policies: A Case from Inner Mongolia

Article Preview

Abstract:

On the basis of the standard CGE model, the paper built and extended the regional energy environment of the dynamic CGE model, which can be applied to calculate carbon emissions not only from energy consumption but also from production process. It set seven scenarios of carbon policies by adopting the fixed tax rate, progressive tax rate, independent carbon tax rate, and balanced carbon tax respectively. The results show that the progressive tax rate has less impact on regional economy, but plays a constant role of energy conservation and emissions reduction in the long term. Although independent carbon tax can reduce CO2 emissions effectively, it has strong negative impact on the domestic economy. The balanced carbon tax rate policy realizes the “double dividend” of carbon tax by reducing the intensity of CO2 emissions and increasing the welfare and income of the residents.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

1701-1708

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Xiaoqing Wu. et. al: Low Carbon Economy, China Environmental Science Press, (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] OECD. Implementation Strategies for Environmental Taxes, Paris: OECD, (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] European Environment Agency (EEA). Environmental Taxes Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness, Copenhagen: EEA, (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] Barker. Journal of Energy Policy, Vol. 26 (1998), p.1083.

Google Scholar

[5] Lee C F, Lin S J, Lewis C. Journal of Energy Policy, Vol. 36 (2008), p.723.

Google Scholar

[6] James M. Poterba. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4 (1993), p.47.

Google Scholar

[7] Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S. Journal of Economics, Vol. 32 (2000), p.395.

Google Scholar

[8] Pengfei Gao, Wenying Chen. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science), Vol. 42 (2002), p.1335.

Google Scholar

[9] Yongbin Zhu, et. al. Journal of China Soft Science, Vol. 24 (2010), p.89.

Google Scholar

[10] Taoyuan Wei. Journal of World Economics and Politics, Vol. 8 (2002), p.47.

Google Scholar

[11] Can Wang, et. al Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science), Vol. 45 (2005), p.1621.

Google Scholar

[12] Mianlv Zhou. Climate Change Research and Development, Vol. 7 (2011), p.210.

Google Scholar

[13] Xin Zhang. Computable general equilibrium model of the basic principles and programming, Shanghai (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] Xinjiletu Yang, Duoduo Liu. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science), Vol. 44 (2013), p.26.

Google Scholar

[15] Burniaux J.M., & Truong,T. GTAP-E. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University (2002).

Google Scholar

[16] Juhuang He, et. al. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Vol. 10 (2002), p.39.

Google Scholar

[17] Shiguo Ma. Journal of China's industrial economy, Vol. 239 (2002), p.20.

Google Scholar

[18] Zhai,F., & Hertel T.W. SSRN eLibrary (2005).

Google Scholar