Study on Intercity Differences of Chinese Urban Economic Efficiency and its Spatial - Temporal Characteristics: Base on 273 Cities at Prefecture Level or above in China

Ga Rang Zhuoma; Ci Fang Wu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2185

Paper Titles

On the Relationship between Economic Growth and Energy Consumption in Beijing
p.2165

Assessment on Ecological Safety of Farmland Fertilization of China
p.2170

Comparative Analysis of Carrying Capacity of Water Resources in all Regions in Xinjiang
p.2175

Green Logistics and Social Sustainable Development
p.2180

Study on Intercity Differences of Chinese Urban Economic Efficiency and its Spatial - Temporal Characteristics: Base on 273 Cities at Prefecture Level or above in China
p.2185

The Empirical Research of the Relationship between Economic Growth and Energy Consumption in Hebei Province
p.2191

Study on Evaluation Method for Sustainable Development of Reservoir Resettlement Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
p.2195

VRP Research Based on Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Algorithm
p.2201

Research on the Islands Sustainable Development Appraisement
p.2206

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 962-965Study on Intercity Differences of Chinese Urban...

Study on Intercity Differences of Chinese Urban Economic Efficiency and its Spatial - Temporal Characteristics: Base on 273 Cities at Prefecture Level or above in China

Abstract:

This paper measures the urban economic efficiency using the three-stage DEA and analyzes the differences and temporal characteristics of the intercity, based on the data from 273 Cities at Prefecture level or above in China during the period 2002 - 2011. The results indicate that : (1) Urban economic efficiency three-stage DEA estimated was significantly lower than the general DEA, indicating that environmental and random factors have a great impact on urban economic efficiency in China; (2) China's urban economic efficiency intercity difference is very significant, "Bei-Shang-Guang" Metropolitan is a major frontier; (3) Urban economic efficiency intercity difference spatial pattern is very stable, spatial concentration areas of the high efficiency and the low in the study little changed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Resources and Sustainable Development III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

2185-2190

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2185

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Ga Rang Zhuoma, Ci Fang Wu

Keywords:

Economic Efficiency, Intercity Differences, Three-Stage DEA

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] World Bank. World Development Report (1997). China Financial and Economic Publishing House, Beijing, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Q. W. Guo, J. X. Jia, Estimating total factor productivity in China, Economic Research Journal, 6(2005)51-60.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Li, X. Xu, H. Chen, Temporal and spatial changes of urban efficiency in the1990s, Acta Geographica sinica. 60(2005)615-622.

Google Scholar

[4] J. G. Liu. G. P. Li. J. T. Zhang, Spatial Distribution and Its Affecting Factors of Economy Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity in China: 1990-2009. Acta Geographica sinica. 67(2012)1069-1084.

Google Scholar

[5] J. T. Wang, R. Zhang, Research on Efficiency of Cultural Industry in 31 Provinces of China( Based on Three- stage DEA Model), China Soft Science. 9(2009)75-82.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Fried. Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis. 17(2002) 121-136.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Y. Shen, D. T. Fen, Spatial Econometrics, Beijing University Press, Beijing, (2010).

Google Scholar