Sandstone Stress Sensitivity Experiment and Stress Sensitivity Evaluation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Change confining pressure experiment or pore pressure experiment is one of the commonly used method to evaluate the reservoir core stress sensitivity. However, a large number of studies have shown that core net stress is not equal to the effective stress,the drawdown pore pressure experiment are consistent with the characteristics of oil and gas field real development process. The pressure stability of drawdown pore pressure experiment is bad, so, a reliable modified method of change confining pressure stress sensitivity experiment is eagerly expected. On the basis of the differential method principle, effective stress coefficient can be determined through core experiments,and with the use of effective stress coefficient , change confining pressure experiment is modified. Main conclusions are as follows:For sandstone core,at reservoir original stress condition with the pore pressure from 15MPa to 11MPa effective stress coefficient from 0.436 to 0.415;Based on Terzaghi effective stress exaggerate stress sensitivity, ontology effective stress can weaken the stress sensitive; Based on effective stress coefficient in this paper correction stress sensitivity is medium weak,impacts on production results almost coincident with the drawdown pore pressure test results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

526-530

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lorenz J C. Stress-sensitive reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1999, 51(01): 61-63.

Google Scholar

[2] Sayers C M. Sensitivity of time‐lapse seismic to reservoir stress-path [J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2006, 54(3): 369-380.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00539.x

Google Scholar

[3] Ruistuen H, Teufel L W, Rhett D. Influence of reservoir stress path on deformation and permeability of weakly cemented sandstone reservoirs [J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1999, 2(03): 266-272.

DOI: 10.2118/56989-pa

Google Scholar

[4] Gland N, Dautriat J, Dimanov A, et al. Stress path dependent hydro mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous carbonate rock[C]/EPJ Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2010, 6: 22006.

DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20100622006

Google Scholar

[5] Xiangfang Li , wang Yang, et al. Considering the effect of pressure arch computate the overlying pressure of Sulige gas field [J]. Gas field in daqing petroleum geology and development, 2013, 32(5): 61-66.

Google Scholar

[6] Heai Ren, ShixuLi Zhao, Fu Cheng , etc. Confining pressure stress sensitivity experiment evaluation of low permeability sandstone [J]. Marine geology frontier, 2012, 28(6): 60-64.

Google Scholar

[7] Terzaghi K., Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York, (1943).

Google Scholar

[8] Kranzz R L, Frankel A D, Engelder T, et al. The permeability of whole and jointed Barre granite[C]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. Pergamon, 1979, 16(4): 225-234.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(79)91197-5

Google Scholar

[9] Walsh J B. Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability[C]/International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. Pergamon, 1981, 18(5): 429-435.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(81)90006-1

Google Scholar

[10] Li M, Bernabé Y, Xiao W I, et al. Effective pressure law for permeability of E‐bei sandstones[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 2009, 114(B7).

DOI: 10.1029/2009jb006373

Google Scholar

[11] Wenlian Xiao, Jinzhou Zhao , Min Li , etc. Sandstone of the rich clay minerals deformation response characteristics research in low permeability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(8).

Google Scholar

[12] BERNABE Y. The effective pressure law for permeability during pore pressure and confining pressure cycling of several crystalline rocks [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1987, 92(B1): 649-657.

DOI: 10.1029/jb092ib01p00649

Google Scholar

[13] Warpinski N R, Teufel L W. Determination of the effective stress law for permeability and deformation in low-permeability rocks[J]. SPE formation evaluation, 1992, 7(2): 123-131.

DOI: 10.2118/20572-pa

Google Scholar