Strength Insertion Implant Fixed on Trabecular Bone Density Based on Insertion Torque and Pull Out

Clara Isabel G. López; Juan Carlos M. Moreno; Julio C. Pinillos

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.976.222

Paper Titles

Developing Alternative Building Materials from Mining Waste
p.202

Elimination of Dyes Present in Textile Industry Wastewater Using Adsorbent Materials Prepared from Broccoli Stem
p.207

Photocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green Dye and Pharmaceuticals Using Co:TiO₂ Thin Films
p.212

Selective Recovery of Zn(II) and Fe(III) by Liquid - Liquid Extraction Using Cyphos IL 109 as Extractant
p.217

Strength Insertion Implant Fixed on Trabecular Bone Density Based on Insertion Torque and Pull Out
p.222

Synthesis of Silver Submicroparticles and Nanoparticles over Microfiltration Membranes Impregnated with Surfactants
p.227

Anisotropic Emission in Strain-Balanced Quantum Well Solar Cells
p.235

Composites Manufactured with Recycled Pet and Reinforced with Zinc Particles
p.240

Development and Characterization of Cementing Composites with Blast Furnace Slag Replacement
p.246

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 976Strength Insertion Implant Fixed on Trabecular...

Strength Insertion Implant Fixed on Trabecular Bone Density Based on Insertion Torque and Pull Out

Abstract:

The main purpose of this research was to measure the resistance of insertion of a dental implant screw designed based on norm, made of the alloy Ti6Al4V [1], which was designed for the cancellous bone density (BD) molar region of the human jaw. The implants were embedded in the in a simulated bone polymer (Sawbone^®) [2] and were compared with specimens of the region molar of human jaw cadaver [3]. Using a digital torque wrench, the values of the insertion torque (IT) were calculated in the specimens with the implants inserted [4]. The minimum measured value was 25 Ncm or 0.25 Nm and the density of the maximum torque value measured was 110 Ncm or 1.1 in Nm recorded in the cadaver jawbone. The Pull Out Test (POT) was then carried out in order to determine the resistance of the insertion implant at the bone interface. The experimental results obtained for density, IT and resistance to insertion were then compared in order to determine the strength of fixation of the implant to the bone interface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 976)

Pages:

222-226

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.976.222

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Clara Isabel G. López*, Juan Carlos M. Moreno, Julio C. Pinillos

Keywords:

Density, Dental Implant, Insertion Torque, Pull out

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Niinomi M. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, (2003) Vol 4 p.445.

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /www. sawbones. com/products/bio/testblocks/solidfoam. aspx.

Google Scholar

[3] Misch C E, Qu Z, and Bidez M W J. Oral and Maxillofacial S. (1999) Vol 57 p.700.

Google Scholar

[4] Dliek O., Tezulas E., and Dincel M., Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology Vol 105 ( 2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.10.003

Google Scholar

[5] Natali A N, Carniel E L, and Pavan P G, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 100, (2010), p.158.

Google Scholar

[6] Mish C. E, Implantología Contemporánea. España. 3era ed. mosby inc. (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] Turkyilmaz I, and Glumphy E.A. BMC Oral Health (2008). Vol. 8 p.32.

Google Scholar

[8] Sahi S., Çehreli M. C, Yalçin. E. Journal of Dentistry. Vol. 30 (2002) p.271.

Google Scholar

[9] F. J. de Cos Juez , F. Sánchez Lasheras , P.J. Gárcia Nieto , A. Alvarez-Arenal. J Applied Mathematics and Computation. Vol. e 206, (2008), p.952.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.10.019

Google Scholar

[10] Homolka P., Beer A., Birkfellner W. R. , Nowotny. A., Gahleitner. M , Tschabitscher; H. Bergmann. Radiology; (2002). Vol. 10 p.224.

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241010948

Google Scholar

[11] Ferraz O N, Shimano A C, Junior M A, Penazzo L C and Candido dos Reis A, International Journal of Dentistry Vol. 2013 (2013), ID 194987, 5.

Google Scholar

[12] Martínez-González J. M., Cano Sánchez J, Campo Trapero J, MJS Martínez González; F García-Saban. Avances en Periodoncia Implantológica. 2002; Vol 14 p.129.

DOI: 10.4321/s1699-65852002000300004

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM 2009 American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM F 543 – 07´1.

Google Scholar

[14] Taylor W R, Roland E. Ploeg H, Hertig D Klabunde R, Warnera M D, Hobathod M C and Rakotomanana L, Journal of Biomechanics , (2002) Vol. 35 p.767.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00022-2

Google Scholar