Reducing Bubble Defect on the Outsole Production Process in the Footwear Manufacturing Industry

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to discover the significant factors causing the bubble defect on the outsoles manufactured by the Case Company. The bubble defect occurs approximately 1.5 per cent of the time or in 36 pairs per day. To understand this problem, experimental studies are undertaken to identify various factors such as injector temperature, mould temperature; that affects the production of waste. The work presented in this paper comprises a review of the relevant literature on the Six Sigma DMAIC improvement process, quality control tools, and the design of the experiments. After the experimentation following the Six Sigma process, the results showed that the defect occurred in approximately 0.5 per cent of the products or in 12 pairs per day; this decreased the production cost from 6,120 AUD per month to 2,040 AUD per month. This research aimed to reduce the amount of waste in men’s flat outsoles. Hence, the outcome of research presented in this paper should be used as a guide for applying the appropriate process for each type of outsole.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 988)
• Pages: 759-763
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.988.759
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Methinee Watcharaphassakorn, Prasad K.D.V. Yarlagadda*
• Keywords: Bubble Defects, DMAIC, Footwear, Leather, Manufacturing, Six Sigma Limits

References

[1] Alin,A., 2010. Minitab[Online]http: /onlinelibrary. wiley. com. ezp01. library. qut. edu. au/doi/10. 1002/wics. 113/pdf , [Accessed 21 October 2013].

[2] Andrews, Didow, N. & Peacock, J., 1998. Economic of World Shoe Production trends. [Online], Available at: http: /www. unc. edu/~andrewsr/ints092/clark. html.

[3] Antony J, 2003. Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists. Jordan Hill: Butterworth-Heinemann . Antony, J. et al., 2012. Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in a transactional environment. Int. Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), pp.31-53.

DOI: 10.1108/02656711211190864

[4] Kubiak, T., 2009. Selecting the right measures for managing processes. Available at: http: /asq. org/quality-progress/2009/08/34-per-million/perusing-process-performance-metrics. html.

[5] Mast, J. d. & Lokkerbol, J., 2012. An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. Int. J. Production Economics, Volume 139, pp.604-614.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.035

[6] World Footwear, 2011. Things change fast and information is crucial. [Online] Available at: http: /www. worldfootwear. com/profile. asp?op=MQ==&id=MA==.

[7] Voigt, K., 2006. WEEKEND JOURNAL; personal development: View from the top; Coping with Asia's rat race. The Wall Street Journal Asia.

[8] Prutruangkrai, P., 2012. Footwear industry's focus on Asean.: http: /www. nationmultimedia. com/business/Footwear-industrys-focus-on-Asean-30188235. html.

[9] Kaushik, P. & Khanduja, D., 2009. Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in thermal power plants: case study. Total Quality Management & Business, 20(2), pp.197-207.

DOI: 10.1080/14783360802622995