Fog Offloading and Scheduling in Traffic Monitoring System by Deep Reinforcement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Innovative environments such as fog computing, which offer computation, data management, and other applications at the network edge, are gaining prominence. Fog networks with Wi-Fi offloading determined to be among the most acceptable methods for combating significant data increases in cellular networks. Fog nodes used to relay traffic and computations are situated nearby, making them excellent relay points. So, why networks have grown as rapidly as they have, and it's left its imprint on their performance. On the other hand, fog computing has recently developed to help Content-Centric Networking (CCN) decrease the amount of traffic. It has shown to be an effective method to reduce network latency and process time in industries and traffic. The use of Vehicle to Device technology for transferring network data in the mobile environment is expected to take off, particularly for autonomous cars. This study considers how to balance energy usage and service delay while allocating mobile traffic among vehicle networks. This article proposes a new paradigm for describing users' desire to provide their mobile vehicle resources to the public. The suggested methods are evaluated via comprehensive simulations, using various mobile movement traces. Additionally, Deep learning algorithm with how an online traffic monitoring for training and how important it is to know that train is possible. In conclusion, this methods proved to be better than previous benchmark techniques for fog networks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

809-816

Citation:

Online since:

February 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ning Z, Huang J, Wang X (2019) Vehicular fog computing: enabling real-time traffic management for smart cities. IEEE Wirel Commun 26(1):87–93.

DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2019.1700441

Google Scholar

[2] Ren J, Zhang D, He S, Zhang Y, Li T (2019) A survey on end-edge-cloud orchestrated network computing paradigms: transparent computing, mobile edge computing, fog computing, and cloudlet. ACM Comput Surv. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362031.

DOI: 10.1145/3362031

Google Scholar

[3] Salaht FA, Desprez F, Lebre A (2020) An overview of service placement problem in fog and edge computing. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 53(3):1–35.

DOI: 10.1145/3391196

Google Scholar

[4] R.U. Yawle, K.K. Modak, S. Shivshette, and S.S. Vhaval, ―Smart Traffic Control System,‖ J. of Electronics and Communication Engineering (SSRG-IJECE) – Vol. 3, Issue 3–March (2016).

Google Scholar

[5] Sivapriya, M., & Pushpa, S. An effective methodology for minutiae based fingerprint matching using singularities indexing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2(5), 1838–1840.

Google Scholar

[6] Varshney P, Simmhan Y (2017) Demystifying fog computing: characterizing architectures, applications and abstractions. In: 2017 IEEE 1st International Conference on Fog and Edge Computing (ICFEC). IEEE, p.115–124.

DOI: 10.1109/icfec.2017.20

Google Scholar

[7] Jerbi, M., Senouci, S. M., G.-Doudane, Y., & Meraihi, R. (2006). GyTAR: Improved greedy traffic aware routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments. In Poster: The third ACM international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET 2006), Los Angeles, CA, USA (p.88–89).

DOI: 10.1145/1161064.1161080

Google Scholar

[8] TomTom Traffic Index 2017, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 21 February 2017, http: //files.shareholder.com /downloads/ TOMTOM/0x0x928844/ 034CDB5B-6FA7- 42A8-B1E6-1521C19FD8DD/TOM_News_2017_2_21_General.pdf.

Google Scholar

[9] Archana, R. & Kumar, Pradeep. (2022). Utilization of Fog Computing in Task Scheduling and Offloading: Modern Growth and Future Challenges. 23-28. 10.1109/ICESIC53714.2022.9783503.

DOI: 10.1109/icesic53714.2022.9783503

Google Scholar