Determination of Cost-Effective Machining Strategies for Rough Pocket Milling of Aluminum by Computer-Aided Manufacturing

Abstract:

Pocketing is one of the most important operations in the machining of complex parts. This milling process usually consumes a large part of the total machining time, especially if an extensive quantity of material is involved, determining the efficiency of the process. This paper studies the influence of the machining strategy and cutting conditions, and the geometry of the pocket on the machining time and cost when milling AW2007 aluminum alloy. For that purpose, a combined methodology based on experimental tests and CAM simulation is proposed. Cost analysis, which represents the main novelty of the research, takes into consideration, properly, the cutting time required to complete the pocket, the tool life, the tool change time and some economic factors such as power and tool costs. Spiral, curvilinear, parallel and zig-zag machining paths, along with seven different pocket geometries, are considered. Parallel and curvilinear milling trajectories have been found as the most cost-effective strategies. The efficiency of the parallel strategy increases with respect to the others as the geometry of the pocket becomes less compact, i.e., it is defined with a higher shape factor. According to the experimental tests and cost results, the machining operation should be performed with the highest feed rate, axial depth and cutting speed of the experimented values, 0.2 mm/tooth, 10 mm and 200 mm/min, respectively.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 132)
• Pages: 176-183
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-2kdOtW
• Online since: October 2023
• Authors: Enrique García-Martínez, Valentín Miguel*, Ángel Mancebo, Alberto Martínez-Martínez
• Keywords: CAM Simulations, Machining Cost, Milling Strategies, Pocket Machining

References

[1] S. Aggarwal and P. Xirouchakis, "Selection of optimal cutting conditions for pocket milling using genetic algorithm," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 66, no. 9–12, p.1943–1958, Jun. 2013.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4472-x

[2] P. E. Romero, R. Dorado, F. A. Díaz, and E. M. Rubio, "Influence of Pocket Geometry and Tool Path Strategy in Pocket Milling of UNS A96063 Alloy," Procedia Eng., vol. 63, p.523–531, 2013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.194

[3] C. Ozoegwu, S. Ofochebe, and C. Ezugwu, "Time minimization of pocketing by zigzag passes along stability limit," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 86, no. 1–4, p.581–601, Sep. 2016.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-8108-9

[4] J. Xu, Y. Sun, and X. Zhang, "A mapping-based spiral cutting strategy for pocket machining," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 67, no. 9–12, p.2489–2500, Aug. 2013.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4666-2

[5] M. B. Bieterman and D. R. Sandstrom, "A Curvilinear Tool-Path Method for Pocket Machining," J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., vol. 125, no. 4, p.709–715, Nov. 2003.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1596579

[6] M. Rauch and J. Y. Hascoet, "Rough pocket milling with trochoidal and plunging strategies," Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater., vol. 2, no. 2, p.161, 2007.

DOI: 10.1504/IJMMM.2007.013780

[7] M. Uzun, Ü. A. Usca, M. Kuntoğlu, and M. K. Gupta, "Influence of tool path strategies on machining time, tool wear, and surface roughness during milling of AISI X210Cr12 steel," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 119, no. 3–4, p.2709–2720, Mar. 2022.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-08365-9

[8] N. Zoghipour, A. F. Yaratan, and Y. Kaynak, "Multi objective optimization of rough pocket milling strategies during machining of lead-free brass alloys using Desirability function and Genetic algorithms-based analysis," Procedia CIRP, vol. 99, p.145–150, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.022

[9] A. Jacso and T. Szalay, "Analysing and Optimizing 2.5D Circular Pocket Machining Strategies," in Advances in Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, Ed. Springer, 2018, p.355–364.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_34

[10] O. Rodriguez-Alabanda, G. Guerrero-Vacas, and P. E. Romero, "Machining time estimation using the geometrics features of the 2.5D pocket contour," Procedia Manuf., vol. 41, p.508–515, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.038

[11] I. F. Edem, V. A. Balogun, B. D. Nkanang, and P. T. Mativenga, "Software analyses of optimum toolpath strategies from computer numerical control (CNC) codes," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 103, no. 1–4, p.997–1007, Jul. 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03604-6

[12] P. S. Sreejith, "Machining of 6061 aluminium alloy with MQL, dry and flooded lubricant conditions," Mater. Lett., vol. 62, no. 2, p.276–278, Jan. 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.019