Data Analytics Applied to Tool Condition Monitoring during Drilling of Hybrid Stacks in Industrial Aircraft Production Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aviation industry is changing significantly as market demands and customer expectations evolve. Aircraft must be designed and manufactured with a future-oriented production system that incorporates computational intelligence, connectivity, and decentralization to ensure the highest levels of quality and performance. By leveraging these technologies, real-time monitoring and continuous process improvement can be achieved through collecting and processing massive amounts of data, accompanied by more sophisticated communication protocols. Among the many operations involved in component assembly, drilling processes are particularly relevant in the aeronautical industry. When drilling airframe components, hybrid joints are generated by combining stacks of various materials, such as titanium and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic (CFRP). Due to the complexity of drilling these hybrid stacks and the need to adhere to strict quality and safety standards, the cost-per-hole can be pretty high. Consequently, scientific studies in this area are of great interest, as they offer the potential to increase productivity and reduce costs. This research aims to investigate using spindle power consumption signals obtained directly from an industrial drilling system to monitor tool wear evolution. Signal pre-processing, feature extraction, selection, and validation are used to analyze data from two sources: the spindle power consumption signals obtained from the internal instrumentation of the machine and the cutting tool. The study focuses on automatic drilling operations carried out in hybrid stacks at an aircraft manufacturing facility, and the results show a strong correlation between power consumption and tool wear. These findings suggest the potential to develop a non-intrusive tool condition monitoring system that could be applied to other machining processes in the industry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

22-30

Citation:

Online since:

October 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wang F, Zhao M, Fu R, Liu X, Qiu S, Yan J, et al. Replaceable drill bit with compound step and sawtooth structures for damages and drilling-cost reduction of CFRP composite. J Manuf Process 2022;81:1018–27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.001

Google Scholar

[2] Jia Z, Fu R, Niu B, Qian B, Bai Y, Wang F. Novel drill structure for damage reduction in drilling CFRP composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2016;110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.08.006

Google Scholar

[3] Pardo A, Heinemann R, Nobre NM, Bagshaw L. Assessment of decision-making algorithms for adaptive drilling of aerospace stacks. Procedia CIRP, vol. 99, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.055

Google Scholar

[4] Abhishek K, Datta S, Mahapatra SS. Optimization of thrust, torque, entry, and exist delamination factor during drilling of CFRP composites. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2015;76.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6199-3

Google Scholar

[5] Rubmann M, Lorenz M, Gerbert P, Waldner M, Justus J, Engel P, et al. Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries. The Boston Consulting Group 2015.

Google Scholar

[6] Saez M, Barton K, Maturana F, Tilbury DM. Modeling framework to support decision making and control of manufacturing systems considering the relationship between productivity, reliability, quality, and energy consumption. J Manuf Syst 2022;62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.011

Google Scholar

[7] Guerra-Sancho A, Perez JF, Garrido MHM, Guisandez JLC, Alvarez JD. Countersink depth control in aeronautical structural components drilling processes by machining forces analysis. 2022 8th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC), IEEE; 2022, p.715–22.

DOI: 10.1109/IESTEC54539.2022.00117

Google Scholar

[8] Duo A, Segreto T, Caggiano A, Basagoiti R, Teti R, Arrazola PJ. Drilling process monitoring: A framework for data gathering and feature extraction techniques. Procedia CIRP, vol. 99, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.123

Google Scholar

[9] Junge T, Nestler A, Schubert A. In-process monitoring and empirical modeling of the tool wear in turning of aluminum alloys using thermoelectric signals. Procedia CIRP, vol. 102, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.09.053

Google Scholar

[10] Zhou L, Li J, Li F, Meng Q, Li J, Xu X. Energy consumption model and energy efficiency of machine tools: A comprehensive literature review. J Clean Prod 2016;112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.093

Google Scholar

[11] Bi ZM, Wang L. Optimization of machining processes from the perspective of energy consumption: A case study. J Manuf Syst 2012;31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.002

Google Scholar

[12] Hu L, Zheng H, Shu L, Jia S, Cai W, Xu K. An investigation into the method of energy monitoring and reduction for machining systems. J Manuf Syst 2020;57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.10.012

Google Scholar

[13] Domínguez-Monferrer C, Fernández-Pérez J, de Santos R, Miguélez MH, Cantero JL. Machine learning approach in non-intrusive monitoring of tool wear evolution in massive CFRP automatic drilling processes in the aircraft industry. J Manuf Syst 2022;65:622–39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.10.018

Google Scholar

[14] Mali R, Telsang MT, Gupta TVK. Real Time Tool Wear Condition Monitoring in Hard Turning of Inconel 718 Using Sensor Fusion System. Mater Today Proc, vol. 4, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.208

Google Scholar

[15] Teti R, Jemielniak K, O'Donnell G, Dornfeld D. Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 2010;59

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010

Google Scholar