Controllability, Dynamics and Randomness: The Generation of Visualization Integration in Parametric Tools during Architectural Design Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper delves into the spatial representation derived from the interplay of controllability, dynamics, and randomness inherent in parametric technology. By synthesizing pertinent literature and employing digital modeling, it seeks to innovate architectural design and visualization through the developmental trajectory of conceptual comprehensive space design. The evolution of design will be delineated into distinct components, conducting digital simulation under the manipulation of key variables. The paper proposes to explore the manipulation of form, the generation of stochastic facades and the simulation of dynamic shapes to demonstrate the functionality of generative systems within the design process. Thereby, after analyzing the potential applications of parametric techniques and their utilization in experimental research, this article endeavors to furnish references and recommendations for their integration into architectural design, parametric generative design, and allied fields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

103-112

Citation:

Online since:

January 2025

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Buonamici, F., Carfagni, M., Furferi, R., Volpe, Y., & Governi, L. (2020). Generative Design: An Explorative Study. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 18(1), 144-155.

DOI: 10.14733/cadaps.2021.144-155

Google Scholar

[2] Quiñones, D., Ojeda, C., Herrera, R. F., & Rojas, L. F. (2024). UXH-GEDAPP: A set of user experience heuristics for evaluating generative design applications. Information and Software Technology, 168, 107408.

DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107408

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang, L., Li, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2024). An interactive generative design technology for appearance diversity-Taking mouse design as an example. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 59, 102263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102263

Google Scholar

[4] Loos, L., Verbeeck, K., & De Laet, L. (2019). Data Visualisation as a Tool for Informed Structural Design. Computer-Aided Design, 115, 267-276.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2019.06.003

Google Scholar

[5] Chen, J., Shao, Z., Zhu, H., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zeng, Z., Yang, Y., Wu, J., & Hu, B. (2023). Sustainable interior design: A new approach to intelligent design and automated manufacturing based on Grasshopper. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 183, 109509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109509

Google Scholar

[6] Tedeschi, A. (2011). "Intervista a David Rutten". MixExperience Tools1 (in Italian and English). Naples, Italy: MixExperience. 28-29.

Google Scholar

[7] Kandikjan, T., Djokikj, J., Mircheski, I., & Angeleska, E. (2022). Integrating parametric design and additive manufacturing knowledge in industrial design education. Materials Today: Proceedings, 70, 687-693.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.124

Google Scholar

[8] Holzer, D. (2016). Design exploration supported by digital tool ecologies. Automation in Construction, 72, 3-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.07.003

Google Scholar

[9] Jabi, W., Soe, S., Theobald, P., Aish, R., & Lannon, S. (2017). Enhancing parametric design through non manifold topology. Design Studies, 52, 96-114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.003

Google Scholar

[10] Chen, M.-T., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Zhao, O., Cheng, B., & Zhao, J. (2024). Parametric topology optimization design and analysis of additively manufactured joints in spatial grid structures. Engineering Structures, 300, 117123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117123

Google Scholar

[11] Yu, Z., Dai, H., & Shi, Z. (2022). Structural form finding of bending components in buildings by using parametric tools and principal stress lines. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(3), 561-573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2021.11.004

Google Scholar

[12] Sommese, F., Hosseini, S. M., Badarnah, L., Capozzi, F., Giordano, S., Ambrogi, V., & Ausiello,G. (2024). Light-responsive kinetic façade system inspired by the Gazania flower: A biomimetic approach in parametric design for daylighting. Building and Environment, 247, 111052.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111052

Google Scholar

[13] Aguilar-Carrasco, M. T., Acosta, I., & Domínguez-Amarillo, S. (2023). CircaLight, a new circadian light assessment tool for Grasshopper environment: Development and reliability testing. Journal of Building Engineering, 71, 106527.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106527

Google Scholar

[14] Brown, N. C., Jusiega, V., & Mueller, C. T. (2020). Implementing data driven parametric building design with a flexible toolbox. Automation in Construction, 118, 103252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103252

Google Scholar

[15] Nazidizaji, S., Tome, A., & Regateiro, F. (2015). Investigation about the Feasibility and Impediments of TRIZ Application in Architectural Design Process. Procedia Engineering, 131, 651- 660.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.344

Google Scholar

[16] Condit, C. W., & Salvadori, M. (1981). Why Buildings Stand Up: The Strength of Architecture. Technology and Culture, 22(4), 790.

DOI: 10.2307/3104583

Google Scholar

[17] Loos, L., Verbeeck, K., & De Laet, L. (2019). Data Visualisation as a Tool for Informed Structural Design. Computer-Aided Design, 115, 267-276.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2019.06.003

Google Scholar

[18] Khakzand, M. & Mozaffar, F. (2008). Architectural design process in the technology age. International Journal of Engineering Sciences, 19.

Google Scholar

[19] Park, E. J., Lee, K., & Kang, E. (2023). The impact of research and representation of site analysis for creative design approach in architectural design studio. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101271

Google Scholar

[20] Stals, A., Jancart, S., & Elsen, C. (2021). Parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices: Towards an adapted design process model. Design Studies, 72, 100978.

DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2020.100978

Google Scholar

[21] Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52, 4-39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001

Google Scholar

[22] Nathan, M. (2012). LunchBox. https://apps.provingground.io/lunchbox/.

Google Scholar

[23] Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Peponis, J. (1984). What do we mean by building function? Designing for Building Utilization, Ed. Powell J (Spon, London), 61-72.

Google Scholar

[24] Wang, P. (2010). Research on Moving Line Design and Spatial Organization of Modern Commercial Pedestrian Block. Ph.D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Google Scholar

[25] Garba, S. B., & Hassanain, M. A. (2004). A review of object-oriented cad potential for building information modelling and life cycle management. The 1st ASCAAD International Conference, e- Design in Architecture, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, December, 343-359.

Google Scholar

[26] Thomas, D. (2020). Polygonal and NURBS Modeling: What's The Difference? https://conceptartempire.com/polygonal-vs-nurbs/.

Google Scholar