Osseointegration and Biocompatibility Study of Macroporous Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (BCP) Ceramics Obtained by Consolidation Using Albumin

Article Preview

Abstract:

The potential of porous materials for applications in the medical, engineering and pharmaceutical areas has been widely reported. Several processing techniques have contributed to the progress in research involving porous biomaterials. To this purpose, a globular protein based (i.e. ovalbumin) consolidation approach has been proposed. In the present study, a porous hydroxyapatite: -tricalcium phosphate - biphasic ceramics (BCP), was processed by direct consolidation using the protein-action technique. The processed porous ceramic exhibited appropriate pore configuration in terms of size, morphology and distribution. BCP cylindrical samples were implanted in male rabbits tibia to the evaluation of the initial biocompatibility and osseointegration for a 30 days period. The morphological analyses, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy evaluated the osseointegration. A rough surface pattern displayed by the ceramics seemed to have improved cell adhesion and proliferation processes. Furthermore, the open porosity of samples was an essential requirement for a suitable bone-implant osseointegration. In conclusion, this study revealed that the porous matrices obtained, promoted suitable development for bone tissue growth and also properties for osseoconduction and osseointegration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

66-71

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.D. Ratner, A.S. Hoffman, F.J. Schoen and J.E. Lemons, in: Biomaterials Science, An introduction to Materials in medicine, edited by Academic Press, San Diego (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Xie, D. Chopin, C. Morin, Z. Zhu, J. Tang and J. Lu: Biomaterials Vol. 27 (2006), p.2761–2767.

Google Scholar

[3] D.D. Deligianni, N.D. Katsala, P.G. Koutsoukos and Y.F. Missirlis: Biomaterials Vol. 22 (2001), pp.87-96.

Google Scholar

[4] D.W. Murray, T. Rae and N. Rushton: J Bone Joint Surg. Vol. 71-B (1989), pp.632-637.

Google Scholar

[5] C.B. Bozal. Actualiz. Osteologia. vol. 2 (2006), pp.19-21.

Google Scholar

[6] D. R. Villarreal, A. Sogal and J.L. Ong: J. Oral Implant Vol. 24 (1988) pp.67-73.

Google Scholar

[7] D.M. Brunette: Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Vol. 3 (1988), pp.231-246.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Ribeiro, J.C. Bressiani and A.H.A. Bressiani: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 361-363, (2008), pp.971-974.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Ribeiro, J. C. Bressiani and A. H. A. Bressiani: Mat. Res. V. 10, (2007), pp.309-312.

Google Scholar

[10] B. König Jr., T.J. Beck, H.F. Kappert, C.C. Kappert and T.S. Masuko: Ann. Anat. Vol. 180, (1998), pp.471-475.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Ducheyne and Q. Qiu: Biomaterials Vol. 20 (1999), pp.2287-2303.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Sepulveda, A.H. Bressiani, J.C. Bressiani, L. Meseguer and B. König Jr.: Mat. Res. Vol. 25. (2002), pp.253-256.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392002000300006

Google Scholar

[13] A. Ravaglioli and A. Krajewski, in: Bioceramics: materials, properties, applications. Chapman & Hall, (1992).

Google Scholar

[14] K.T. Bowers, J.C. Keller, B.A. Randolphi, D.G. Wick and C.M. Michaels: Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Vol. 7 (1992), pp.302-310.

Google Scholar