Review of the Development of the Proposed Yucca Mountain Geologic Repository

Abstract:

It can be said that the nuclear community neglected the issue of final storage of nuclear waste in the first era of nuclear power production, with many nations not looking at this topic until some years into its program. This is a matter that must not be neglected now during the ‘renaissance’ of nuclear if nuclear energy is to have a part on the stage of the play in world energy supplies. In 1982, the United States (U.S.) Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA), which outlines the screening process for selecting a national site for used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste storage. This paper describes the U.S. nuclear waste policy dilemma and its impact on the selection and development of the nation's first long-term geologic repository for over 70,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. In 1987, the U.S. Congress designated Yucca Mountain, which can be described as the "most studied real estate on the planet", as the repository site to be characterized. However, due to political pressures, the fate and realization of the Yucca Mountain repository is uncertain.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 94)
• Pages: 115-120
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.94.115
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Charlotta E. Sanders*
• Keywords: Geologic Repository, Nuclear Waste, Yucca Mountain

References

[1] Yucca Mountain: The Most Studied Real Estate on the Plant. Report to the Chairman Senator James M. Inhofe U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Majority Staff, March (2006).

[2] Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy, January (2012).

[3] Nuclear Legislation in OECD Countries Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities, United States of America.

[4] Nuclear Policy Waste Act. 42 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.

[5] Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act 1987. 42 U.S.C. 10172 et seq.

[6] C.E. Sanders, Review of the Development of the Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (TAD) Waste Disposal System for the Proposed Yucca Mountain Geologic Repository, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 62, 8-15 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.07.007

[7] Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Final Rule , Federal Register, Volume 66, No. 114, pp.32073-32135, 13 June (2001).

[8] Final Environmental Impact Statement: Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste, Vol. 1, 1980. U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/EIS-0046F.

DOI: 10.1016/s0195-9255(82)80010-3

[9] Wehrum, William (March 1, 2006). Full Committee Oversight Hearing on the Status of the Yucca Mountain Project,. U.S. Senate committee on Environmental and Public Works.

[10] Vandenbosch, Robert, and Susanne E. Vandenbosch. 2007. Nuclear waste stalemate. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 111, 190–191.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2970215

[11] U.S. National Research Council, Committee on Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards. 1995. Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

DOI: 10.17226/4943

[12] Federal Register 73, 61256, Oct. 15, (2008).

[13] U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, March 2008. Transportation, Aging and Disposal Canister System Performance Specification, Revision 1 (WMO-TADCS-000001).

[14] U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, February 2002. Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report, Revision 1 (DOE/RW-0539-1).

[15] Information on http: /www. cadc. uscourts. gov/internet/opinions. nsf/BAE0CF34F762EBD985257BC6004DEB18/$file/11-1271-1451347. pdf.

[16] Information on http: /www. state. nv. us/nucwaste/licensing/doe100303withdraw. pdf.