Effect of Target Reliability Level on Partial Factors for Existing Steel Railway Bridges

Article Preview

Abstract:

Many existing steel railway bridges, often recognized and protected for their heritage value, are exposed to degradation and increasing traffic loads and their reliability needs to be assessed. The key question is whether a particular bridge can be preserved, or needs to be strengthened or replaced. The main aspect in decision-making is specification of the target reliability. Development and wider use of the adjusted partial factor method seem to be reasonable to find the balance between demands on the input information, computational complexity, and improvements in reliability assessment. Adjusted partial factors are based on the relevant statistical parameters for basic variables and a selected target reliability index. In this contribution, the effect of the target reliability on updated partial factors are demonstrated. The case study illustrates that the target reliability levels recommended in various documents for new and existing structures are inconsistent in terms of the values and criteria according to which these values are to be selected. Consequently, the values of the partial factors for assessment may be significantly dissimilar.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

63-71

Citation:

Online since:

September 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Lenner, P. Ryjacek, and M. Sykora, Resistance models for semi-probabilistic assessment of historic steel bridges, in IABSE Symposium, Wroclaw 2020: Synergy of Culture and Civil Engineering - History and Challenges, Report, 2020, p.1061–1068.

DOI: 10.2749/wroclaw.2020.1061

Google Scholar

[2] M. Sykora, J. Mlcoch, and P. Ryjacek, Uncertainties in Characteristic Strengths of Historic Steels Using Non-Destructive Techniques, Trans. VSB - Tech. Univ. Ostrava, Civ. Eng. Ser., vol. 19, no. 2, p.65–70, 2019,.

Google Scholar

[3] ISO 2394, General Principles on Reliability for Structures, 4th ed. Geneve, Switzerland: ISO, (2015).

Google Scholar

[4] CEN/TC 250/WG 2, prEN1990-2 Eurocode - Basis of assessment and retrofitting of existing structures: general rules and actions (draft April 2021). (2021).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Holický and M. Sýkora, Reliability Approaches Affecting the Sustainability of Concrete Structures, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 5, 2021,.

DOI: 10.3390/su13052627

Google Scholar

[6] J. Bien, L. Elfgren, and J. Olofsson, Sustainable Bridges. Assessment for Future Traffic Demands and Longer Lives. 490 pp. Available as D9.2 from www.sustainablebridges.net. (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] R. D. J. M. Steenbergen, M. Sýkora, D. Diamantidis, M. Holický, and T. Vrouwenvelder, Economic and human safety reliability levels for existing structures, Struct. Concr., vol. 16, no. 3, p.323–332, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201500022.

DOI: 10.1002/suco.201500022

Google Scholar

[8] EN 1990, Eurocode - Basis of structural design. CEN, Brussels, p.87, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] ISO 13822, Bases for design of structures - Assessment of existing structures. Geneve, Switzerland: ISO TC98/SC2, (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] CEN/TC 250, prEN1990. Eurocode - Basis of structural design. Annex A.2. Application for bridges (draft 2019-10). (2019).

Google Scholar

[11] ČSN 730038, Navrhování konstrukcí - Doplňující ustanovení pro hodnocení existujících konstrukcí. Praha: ČAS (Czech Standardization Agency), (2019).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Holicky, D. Diamantidis, and M. Sykora, Reliability levels related to different reference periods and consequence classes, Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, vol. 113, no., p.22–26, (2018).

DOI: 10.1002/best.201800039

Google Scholar

[13] FIB Bulletin 65, FIB Model Code 2020, draft. (2021).

Google Scholar

[14] SŽ S5/1, Diagnostika , zatížitelnost a přechodnost železničních mostních objektů (Diagnostics, load-bearing capacity and transitability of railway bridge structures). (2021).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Holicky, Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (2013).

Google Scholar

[16] V. N. Moreira, J. Fernandes, J. C. Matos, and D. V Oliveira, Reliability-based assessment of existing masonry arch railway bridges, Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 115, p.544–554, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.030

Google Scholar

[17] D. F. Wisniewski, J. R. Casas, and M. Ghosn, Simplified probabilistic non-linear assessment of existing railway bridges, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 5, no. 6, p.439–453, (2009).

DOI: 10.1080/15732470701639906

Google Scholar

[18] V. Nadolski and M. Sykora, Uncertainty in Resistance Models for Steel Members, Trans. VŠB – Tech. Univ. Ostrava, Civ. Eng. Ser., vol. 14, no. 2, p.26–37, 2015,.

DOI: 10.2478/tvsb-2014-0028

Google Scholar

[19] CEN TC250/ Ad Hoc Group Reliability of Eurocodes (convenor - Ton Vrouwenvelder) Technical Report for the reliability background of Eurocodes. Draft June 2021. p.165, (2021).

Google Scholar

[20] JCSS, JCSS Probabilistic Model Code (periodically updated, online publication). Joint Committee on Structural Safety, (2021).

Google Scholar

[21] M. Sykora, M. Holicky, J. Markova, and T. Senberger, Probabilistic Reliability Assessment of Existing Structures (Focused on Industrial Heritage Buildings), 1st ed. Prague: Czech Technical University in Prague, CTU Publishing House, (2016).

Google Scholar