Evaluation of the Environmental Fatigue at a Long Radius Elbow of a Piping System under Transient Thermo Mechanical Stresses

Abstract:

Thermal fatigue widely takes place in light water reactor (LWR) piping systems. It is an important aging mechanism of a nuclear reactor. Thermal transient effects occur at the startup and shutdown of a nuclear power plant. During the thermal transients, local and global cyclic stresses are induced in the piping systems. They are exacerbated by local geometric imperfections and environmental factors, which may lead to crack initiation. The elbows of such piping systems are subject to various combinations of loads (internal pressure, bending, and torsion, as well as thermal fluctuations) during their service life. As can be seen, high-stress concentrations are developed in these piping elements. Therefore, it is important to make a failure evaluation. In this paper, a 12” pipe system segment, which was made with SA 106 Gr C steel, has been considered. It was composed by two straight sections joined by a long radius elbow. Typical start-up and shutdown transient effects of a BWR-5 were considered. A computer-aided thermo-mechanical analysis was carried out using the finite element method. The linearization of the stresses was considered, based on the ASME B & PVC Code Section III, subsection NB. Under these conditions, environmental fatigue was analyzed after 40-and 60-years operation.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 412)
• Pages: 197-206
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.412.197
• Online since: November 2021
• Authors: Lenin Ramos-Cantú, Luis Héctor Hernández-Gómez*, Rafael García-Illescas, Tanya Nerina Arreola-Valles, José Javier Moctezuma-Reyes, Laura Guadalupe Carbajal-Figueroa, Alejandra Armenta-Molina, Juan Alfonso Beltrán-Fernández
• Keywords: Fatigue Usage, Peak Stress, Stress Linearization, Thermal Transient

References

[1] P. Arora et al., Fatigue crack growth behavior in pipes and elbows of carbon steel and stainless steel materials, Procedia Eng. 55 (2013) 703–709.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.318

[2] X. Schuler and K. H. Herter, Thermal Fatigue due to Stratification and Thermal Shock Loading of Piping, 30th MPA-Seminar conjunction with 9th Ger. Semin. (2004) [Online]. Available: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/36/036/36036665.pdf.

[3] E. Paffumi, K. Nilsson, and N. G. Taylor, Simulation of thermal fatigue damage in a 316L model pipe component Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 85 11 (2008) 798–813.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.06.002

[4] K. Nilsson, F. Dolci, T. Seldis, S. Ripplinger, A. Grah, and I. Simonovski, Assessment of Thermal Fatigue Life for 316L and P91 Pipe Components at Elevated Temperatures, Eng. Fract. Mech. (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.09.006

[5] K. Evon, T. Gilman, and M. Walter, Fatigue monitoring of BWR feedwater nozzles, Proceedings of the ASME Pressure and Piping Conference. (2013) 1–6.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2013-98032

[6] M. F. Harun, R. Mohammad, and A. Kotousov, Low cycle fatigue behavior of elbows with local wall thinning, Metals (Basel). 10 (2020) 1–9.

DOI: 10.3390/met10020260

[7] F. A. Simonen et al., Evaluation of environmental effects on fatigue life of piping, Nucl. Eng. Des. 208 (2001) 143–165.

[8] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1 — Appendices Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components, 2010th ed. ASME International, (2010).

DOI: 10.2172/1471711

[9] W. J. O. Donnell, W. J. O. Donnell, and T. P. O. Donnell, Proposed new fatigue design curves for austenitic stainless, J. Press. Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME. (2005) 1–24.

[10] W. J. O'Donnell and T. P. O'Donnell, Proposed new fatigue design curves for carbon and low-alloy steels in high temperature water, J. Press. Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME. 131 (2009) 1–10.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3006896

[11] O. K. Chopra, Development of fatigue design curve for austenitic stainless steels in LWR environments: A Review, Proceedings of PVP. (2002) 1-14.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2002-1229

[12] O. K. Chopra, W. F. Michaud, and W. J. Shack, Fatigue of carbon and low-alloy steels in LWR environments, Proceedings of water Reactor Safety Meeting. (1993).

DOI: 10.2172/10114321

[13] O. K. Chopra and W. J. Shack, Methods for incorporating effects of LWR coolant environment into ASME code fatigue evaluations, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP. 386 (1999) 171–181.

[14] O. K. Chopra and G. L. Stevens, Effect of LWR water environments on the fatigue life of reactor materials, NUREG/CR-6909,Rev.1; Final Report, Washington, DC, (2018).

[15] M. Higuchi and K. Iida, Fatigue strength correction factors for carbon and low-alloy steels in oxygen-containing high-temperature water, Nucl. Eng. Des. 129 (1991) 293–306.

DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(91)90138-8

[16] M. Higuchi, Revised proposal of fatigue life correction factor Fen for carbon and low alloy steels in LWR water environments, J. Press. Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME. 126 (2004) 438–444.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1767860

[17] K. Sakaguchi, S. Suzuki, H. Kanasaki, Y. Nomura, K. Tsutsumi, and M. Higuchi, Effect of factors on fatigue life in PWR water environment, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Press. Vessel. Pip. Div. PVP. (2006) 1–9.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2006-icpvt-11-93217

[18] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components III Division 1-Subsection NB, Class 1 Components. (2010).

DOI: 10.1115/1.802694.ch6

[19] R. A. Ibrahim, Handbook of structural life assessment, first ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken, NJ, (2017).

[20] G. L. Stevens, Environmentally Assisted Fatigue Screening Methods (Revision 1), EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, (2020).