Influence of Process Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of 316L Stainless Steel: A Dual-System Study

Abstract:

This study examines the influence of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) param eters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AISI 316L stainless steel, comparing out puts from two different systems: the Fronius TransPuls Synergic 2700 CMT and the Kemppi X5 500 Pulse+. By employing Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) for microstructural characterization alongside tensile and hardness tests, we investigated how different printing speeds, wire feed rates, and free wire lengths impact the material’s properties. The Fronius system produced parts with a fine, uniform, columnar grain structure, leading to more isotropic mechanical properties. In contrast, the Kemppi system resulted in coarser grains with delta ferrite, increasing ductility but also introducing anisotropy. The geometry and hardness of the parts also showed significant variations, underscoring the critical need for parameter optimization in WAAM to achieve desired material characteristics for specific applications. These findings highlight the importance of process parameter tuning to minimize defects and enhance the consistency and performance of additively manufactured parts.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 443)
• Pages: 79-85
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-N5ekho
• Online since: June 2025
• Authors: Timo Rautio*, Mikko Hietala, Matias Jaskari, Antti Järvenpää
• Keywords: 316L, Mechanical Properties, Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing

References

[1] Mukti Chaturvedi, Elena Scutelnicu, Carmen Catalina Rusu, Luigi Renato Mistodie, Danut Mihailescu, and Arungalai Vendan Subbiah. Metals, 11(6):939, June 2021.

DOI: 10.3390/met11060939

[2] Nilesh Kumar, Het Bhavsar, P.V.S. Mahesh, Ashish Kumar Srivastava, Bhaskor J. Bora, Ambuj Saxena, and Amit Rai Dixit. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 285:126144, June 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126144

[3] Laukik P. Raut and Ravindra V. Taiwade. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 30(7):4768-4791, June 2021.

[4] Kai Treutler and Volker Wesling. Applied Sciences, 11(18):8619, September 2021.

[5] Zhe Chen and Gim Song Soh. pages 205-243. Springer International Publishing, November 2022.

[6] Davoud Jafari, Tom H.J. Vaneker, and Ian Gibson. Materials & Design, 202:109471, April 2021.

[7] Abid Shah, Rezo Aliyev, Henning Zeidler, and Stefan Krinke. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 7(3):97, May 2023.

[8] Bunty Tomar, S. Shiva, and Tameshwer Nath. Materials Today Communications, 31:103739, June 2022.

[9] Manu Srivastava, Sandeep Rathee, Ankit Tiwari, and Mehul Dongre. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 294:126988, January 2023.

[10] Tiago A. Rodrigues, V. Duarte, R. M. Miranda, Telmo G. Santos, and J. P. Oliveira. Materials, 12(7):1121, April 2019.

[11] Sudhanshu Ranjan Singh and Pradeep Khanna. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44:118-128, 2021.

[12] Wanwan Jin, Chaoqun Zhang, Shuoya Jin, Yingtao Tian, Daniel Wellmann, and Wen Liu. Applied Sciences, 10(5):1563, February 2020.

[13] Muhammad Safwan Mohd Mansor, Sufian Raja, Farazila Yusof, Mohd Ridha Muhamad, Yupiter HP. Manurung, Mohd Shahriman Adenan, Nur Izan Syahriah Hussein, and James Ren. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 30:2478-2499, May 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.170

[14] Bintao Wu, Zengxi Pan, Donghong Ding, Dominic Cuiuri, Huijun Li, Jing Xu, and John Norrish. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 35:127-139, October 2018.