Comparison of Fresh Water and Salt Production of Seawater Desalination Using Gas Stoves and Induction Stoves

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates household-scale seawater desalination to address freshwater shortages, particularly in coastal areas or during emergencies. The process involves heating seawater to evaporate it and then condensing the vapor into freshwater. The research compares the efficiency of pure water and salt production from seawater desalination using two heating methods which is gas stoves and induction stoves. Gas stoves which use fossil fuel combustion and induction stoves which use electromagnetic fields to generate heat have different characteristics and efficiencies in the desalination process. After the heating, the seawater then cooling down by using 3 different speed of fan speed.This study evaluates the differences in the amount of pure water and salt produced by these two methods, considering factors such as energy consumption and operational costs. The results of this research are expected to provide useful insights for selecting more efficient and economical heating methods in the seawater desalination process.The results indicate that freshwater production is higher when using an induction stove compared to a gas stove. Freshwater production at low fan speeds yielded 157 g/hour on an induction stove with 600 W power and 147 g/hour on a gas stove with equivalent power of 658.75 W; 168 g/hour on an induction stove with 600 W power and 88 g/hour on a gas stove with equivalent power of 632.92 W; and 153 g/hour on an induction stove with 600 W power and 105 g/hour on a gas stove with equivalent power of 646.58 W. The heating with an induction stove produces more freshwater compared to heating with a gas stove due to its Energy Efficiency, Precise Temperature Control, Heating Speed, Reduced Heat Loss which is better than gas stove.In terms of salt production, both induction and gas stoves produced nearly identical amounts of salt: 34 g/liter on the induction stove and 36 g/liter on the gas stove at low fan speeds; 36 g/liter on the induction stove and 34 g/liter on the gas stove at medium fan speeds; and 34 g/liter on the induction stove and 36 g/liter on the gas stove at high fan speeds. The power required to produce 1 gram of freshwater at low fan speed was 3.57 watts for the induction stove and 7.18 watts for the gas stove; at high fan speed, it needs 3.92 watts for the induction stove and 6.15 watts for the gas stove. Therefore, it can be concluded that the power consumption for the induction stove is significantly lower than that for the gas stove to produce 1 gram of freshwater.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 18)

Pages:

111-120

Citation:

Online since:

February 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. van der Geer, J.A.J. Hanraads, R.A. Lupton, The art of writing a scientific article, J. Sci. Commun. 163 (2000) 51-59.

Google Scholar

[2] Kilic, V.T., Unal, E. and Volkan Demir, H. (2020), High-efficiency flow-through induction heating. IET Power Electronics, 13: 2119-2126

DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1609

Google Scholar

[3] Jonathan P. P. Noble, Simon J. Bending, and Alfred K. Hill. (2024), Radiofrequency Induction Heating for Green Chemicals Manufacture: A Systematic Model of Energy Losses and a Scale-Up Case-Study, ACS Engineering Au0,0, pp. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ acsengineeringau.4c00009

DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.4c00009

Google Scholar

[4] Kilic, V.T., Unal, E. and Volkan Demir, H. (2020), High-efficiency flow-through induction heating. IET Power Electronics, 13: 2119-2126

DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.1609

Google Scholar

[5] Jonathan P. P. Noble, Simon J. Bending, and Alfred K. Hill. (2024), Radiofrequency Induction Heating for Green Chemicals Manufacture: A Systematic Model of Energy Losses and a Scale-Up Case-Study, ACS Engineering Au0,0, pp. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021 /acsengineeringau.4c00009

DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.4c00009

Google Scholar

[6] Plumed, E., Acero, J., Lope, I. and Burdío, J.M. (2020), Design methodology of high performance domestic induction heating systems under worktop. IET Power Electronics, 13: 300-306

DOI: 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.0693

Google Scholar

[7] Kusumawati, I. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Air Bersih Di Kecamatan Selat Nasik Kabupaten Belitung Provinsi Bangka Belitung Tahun 2017. J. Environ. Eng. Waste Manag., 3(1), 30-35. doi: 10.33021/jenv.v3i1.399. :

DOI: 10.33021/jenv.v3i1.399

Google Scholar

[8] Noviyanti, E., & Setiawan, R. P. (2014). Penyediaan Air Bersih pada Kawasan Rawan Air Bersih di Pesisir Utara Lamongan. J. Tataloka, 16

DOI: 10.14710/tataloka.16.2.116-132

Google Scholar

[9] Desalination system could produce freshwater that is cheaper than tap water, https://news.mit.edu/2023/desalination-system-could-produce-freshwater-cheaper-0927

Google Scholar

[10] Gurib-Fakim, A., et al. (2018). Making Every Drop Count-An Agenda for Water Action. HLPWater Outcome Rep., March, 234.

DOI: 10.3362/0262-8104.1993.008

Google Scholar

[11] Nurjannah, I., & Sudarsono. (2018). Penerapan Destilator Air Laut Sebagai Solusi Ketiadaan Sumber Air bagi Suku Bajo di Kabupaten Wakatobi. Semin. Nas. Teknol. Terap. Berbas. Kearifan Lokal.

Google Scholar

[12] Water Desalination: History, Advances, and Challenges. Retrieved from [https://oxfordre.com/environmentalscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-599]. https://cookupexperts.com/induction-stove-vs-gas/

Google Scholar

[13] Desalination: From Ancient to Present and Future. Retrieved from [https://www.treehugger.com/which-more-energy-efficient-cooking-gas-or-induction-4858206].

Google Scholar

[14] Desalination of Water: a Review. Current Pollution Reports - Springer. Retrieved from [https://www.treehugger.com/which-more-energy-efficient-cooking-gas-or-induction-4858206].

Google Scholar

[15] Elimelech, M., & Phillip, W. A. (2011). The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment. Science, 333(6043), 712-717. doi: 10.1126/science. 1200488.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1200488

Google Scholar

[16] Ghaffour, N., Missimer, T. M., & Amy, G. L. (2013). Technical Review and Evaluation of the Economics of Water Desalination: Current and Future Challenges for Better Water Supply Sustainability. Desalination, 309, 197-207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.015

Google Scholar

[17] Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B., & Moulin, P. (2009). Reverse Osmosis Desalination: Water Sources, Technology, and Today's Challenges. Water Research, 43

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010

Google Scholar

[18] 2317-2348. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010. : Shannon, M. A., Bohn, P. W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J. G., Marinas, B. J., & Mayes, A. M. (2008). Science and Technology for Water Purification in the Coming Decades. Nature, 452(7185), 301-310.

DOI: 10.1038/nature06599

Google Scholar