Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Monolithic Zirconia under Polishing and Glazing Using CAD/CAM Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

AbstractAlthough manufacturers recommend glazing and polishing for CAD/CAM milled restorations, the relative efficacy of either in achieving optimal surface roughness and wear remains ambiguous. This study has been carried out to investigate how polishing and glazing affect the surface characteristics and hardness of milled monolithic zirconia. Thirty cuboid-shaped milled zirconia samples (10 mm length× 10 mm width× 3mm thickness) were cut from a pre-sintered zirconia block (Aconia®, Besmile Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu, China). Samples were sintered, cleaned, and divided into two groups according to surface treatment (n = 15). Group P: Polished only, Group PG: Polished and glazed. Each treatment was performed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. One sample was examined from each group using a Scanning Electron microscope (SEM) to explore the surface morphology. Surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Vickers hardness (VHN) was evaluated using a Vickers diamond indenter. All data were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed. There was a significant difference between groups in surface roughness and hardness. The average surface roughness (Ra) value of polished zirconia samples (2.1611 µm) was higher than the Ra value of glazed zirconia samples (1.3273 µm), while the Vickers hardness (VHN) of polished zirconia samples (1.4721) was lower than the VHN of glazed zirconia samples (3.7843). SEM analysis images validated the findings on the surface roughness. The glazing after polishing of monolithic zirconia showed better surface smoothness and higher hardness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 30)

Pages:

31-41

Citation:

Online since:

January 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rasheed, R.K., et al., Subtractive and Additive Technologies in Fixed Dental Restoration: A Systematic Review. Journal of Techniques, 2023. 5(4): pp.162-167.

Google Scholar

[2] Turki, S.A., M.H. Abdulsattar, and Z.N. Alwahab, Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials. Journal of Techniques, 2023. 5(3): pp.234-239.

DOI: 10.51173/jt.v5i3.1074

Google Scholar

[3] Fouad, R.I., L.E. alwan Al Jorani, and A.K.J.K. Al-Azzawi, Evaluation of the Effect of Different Glazing Brands on Hardness of Monolithic Zirconia Fabricated By CAD/CAM Technique. Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences, 2023. 11(1): pp.57-68.

DOI: 10.25130/tjds.11.1.7

Google Scholar

[4] Corbani, K., et al., Effect of material thickness on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of 3D-printed composite crowns. Int J Comput Dent, 2020. 23(3): pp.225-233.

Google Scholar

[5] Albani, R., et al., The Surface Roughness of Contemporary Indirect CAD/CAM Restorative Materials That Are Glazed and Chair-Side-Finished/Polished. Materials, 2024. 17(5): p.997.

DOI: 10.3390/ma17050997

Google Scholar

[6] Konstantinidis, I., et al., Clinical outcomes of monolithic zirconia crowns with CAD/CAM technology. A 1-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 65 patients. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. 15(11): p.2523.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112523

Google Scholar

[7] Candido, L., et al., Mechanical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia. Operative dentistry, 2018. 43(3): p. E119-E128.

DOI: 10.2341/17-019-l

Google Scholar

[8] Fouad, R.I., L.E.A. Al Jorani, and A.K.J.K. Al-Azzawi, Evaluation of the Effect of Different Glazing Brands on Surface Roughness of Monolithic Zirconia. Journal of Techniques, 2023. 5(2): pp.155-162.

DOI: 10.51173/jt.v5i2.940

Google Scholar

[9] Özkurt-Kayahan, Z., Monolithic zirconia: A review of the literature. Biomed Res, 2016. 27(4): pp.1427-36.

Google Scholar

[10] Hashim, A.R. and N.S. Mansoor, Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Surface Roughness and Vickers Micro-Hardness of Feldspathic Porcelain: An In Vitro Study. MUSTANSIRIA DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021. 17(1).

DOI: 10.32828/mdj.v17i1.1014

Google Scholar

[11] Azeez, S.M. and S.A. Salih, Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of topography for CAD/CAM all ceramic zirconia after different surface treatments. Erbil Dental Journal (EDJ), 2019. 2(1): pp.164-172.

DOI: 10.15218/edj.2019.06

Google Scholar

[12] Caglar, I., S.M. Ates, and Z.Y. Duymus, The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2018. 10(2): pp.132-137.

DOI: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132

Google Scholar

[13] Kumchai, H., et al., Effect of glazing on flexural strength of full‐contour zirconia. International journal of dentistry, 2018. 2018(1): p.8793481.

DOI: 10.1155/2018/8793481

Google Scholar

[14] Mohammadi-Bassir, M., et al., Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2017. 118(5): pp.658-665.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.019

Google Scholar

[15] Chintapalli, R.K., et al., Effect of sandblasting and residual stress on strength of zirconia for restorative dentistry applications. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2014. 29: pp.126-137.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.004

Google Scholar

[16] Riyadh, M. and M.M. Nayif, Evaluation of Different Zirconia Surface Treatments on their Microhardness. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, 2020. 20(2): pp.273-282.

DOI: 10.33899/rden.2020.166475

Google Scholar

[17] Tanaka, Y., Y. Seino, and K. Hattori, Automated Vickers hardness measurement using convolutional neural networks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020. 109(5): pp.1345-1355.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05746-4

Google Scholar

[18] Fouad, R.I., L.E. alwan Al Jorani, and A.K.J. Al-Azzawi, The Effect of Glazing on Full Contour Zirconia-A Systematic Review. Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences, 2023. 11(1): pp.109-121.

DOI: 10.25130/tjds.11.1.13

Google Scholar

[19] Al Hamad, K.Q., et al., Surface roughness of monolithic and layered zirconia restorations at different stages of finishing and polishing: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2019. 28(7): pp.818-825.

DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13071

Google Scholar

[20] Goo, C., et al., Effect of polishing systems on surface roughness and topography of monolithic zirconia. Operative Dentistry, 2016. 41(4): pp.417-423.

DOI: 10.2341/15-064-l

Google Scholar

[21] Nabih, S.O. and F.A.M. Ahmed, Surface roughness and Hardness of Translucent Zirconia with different Post-sintering interventions. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 2023. 26(4): pp.439-447.

DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2023.225810.1443

Google Scholar

[22] Miura, S., et al., Effects of abutment tooth and luting agent colors on final color of high-translucent zirconia crowns. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2022. 66(2): pp.243-249.

DOI: 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_21_00025

Google Scholar

[23] Akan, E., et al., Effects of different finishing procedures on surface roughness of hybrid CAD/CAM materials. J Dent Indones, 2021. 28: pp.185-91.

Google Scholar

[24] Ozdogan, A. and Z. Yesil Duymus, Investigating the effect of different surface treatments on vickers hardness and flexural strength of zirconium and lithium disilicate ceramics. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2020. 29(2): pp.129-135.

DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12939

Google Scholar

[25] Abd Kati, F. and A.F.J. Al-Kaabi, Effect of oil paint addition on micro hardness of acrylic ocular prosthesis. Iraqi Dental Journal, 2016. 38(2): pp.87-89.

DOI: 10.26477/idj.v38i2.83

Google Scholar

[26] Incesu, E. and N. Yanikoglu, Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2020. 124(1): pp.100-109.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003

Google Scholar

[27] Maminskas, J., et al., Novel Yttria-Stabilized Zirconium Oxide and Lithium Disilicate Coatings on Titanium Alloy Substrate for Implant Abutments and Biomedical Application. Materials, 2020. 13(9): p.2070.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13092070

Google Scholar

[28] Mohammed, N.A. and I.N. Yassen, Effects of different core thickness on the microhardness of lithium-disilicate glass ceramic. Journal of Oral and Dental Research, 2019. 23(8401): pp.1-8.

DOI: 10.12816/0060716

Google Scholar

[29] Hmaidouch, R., et al., Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. International journal of oral science, 2014. 6(4): pp.241-246.

DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2014.34

Google Scholar

[30] Manziuc, M.-M., et al., Optical properties of translucent zirconia: A review of the literature. The EuroBiotech Journal, 2019. 3(1): pp.45-51.

Google Scholar

[31] Kulvarangkun, A., W. Panyayong, and P. Pumpaluk, Experimental study of surface roughness of dental ceramics after polishing with three types of polishing systems. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, 2022. 12(5): pp.540-546.

DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_107_22

Google Scholar

[32] Jamali, M., et al., Comparative effects of glazing versus polishing on mechanical, optical, and surface properties of zirconia ceramics with different translucencies. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 2024. 10(3): p. e884.

DOI: 10.1002/cre2.884

Google Scholar

[33] Kolakarnprasert, N., et al., New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure and translucency. Dental Materials, 2019. 35(5): pp.797-806.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.017

Google Scholar

[34] Nakamura, K., et al., The influence of low-temperature degradation and cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2015. 47: pp.49-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.007

Google Scholar

[35] Zhang, F., et al., Highly-translucent, strong and aging-resistant 3Y-TZP ceramics for dental restoration by grain boundary segregation. Acta biomaterialia, 2015. 16: pp.215-222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.037

Google Scholar

[36] Tong, H., et al., Characterization of three commercial Y-TZP ceramics produced for their high-translucency, high-strength and high-surface area. Ceramics international, 2016. 42(1): pp.1077-1085.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.033

Google Scholar

[37] Shao, L., D. Jiang, and J. Gong, Nanoindentation characterization of the hardness of zirconia dental ceramics. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2013. 15(8): pp.704-707.

DOI: 10.1002/adem.201200367

Google Scholar

[38] Ali, M.M.S.G. and O.M. Abd-Elhamed, Effect of surface finish and acidic medium on hardness and fracture toughness of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (An In-vitro study). 2023.

DOI: 10.22271/oral.2023.v9.i2g.1769

Google Scholar

[39] Triwatana, P., P. Srinuan, and K. Suputtamongkol, Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2013. 5(1): p.36.

DOI: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36

Google Scholar