Preliminary Evaluation of UV/H2O2 Treatment for MBR Effluent from Dragon Fruit Processing Wastewater toward Reuse

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study assesses the potential for wastewater reuse from the dragon fruit (Hylocereus) concentrate production process, utilising an integrated membrane bioreactor (MBR) in conjunction with a UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process (AOP). The MBR system effectively removed organic matter, nitrogen, suspended solids, and colour, with COD and total nitrogen (T-N) reduced to 92–226 mg/L and <0.2 mg/L, respectively. The removal efficiencies exceeded 91% and 98%, respectively. The MBR effluent met discharge standards and was suitable for further treatment. Subsequent AOP polishing significantly improved water quality, yielding BOD5, total phosphorus (T-P), and total nitrogen (T-N) concentrations of 18.2 mg/L, 0.3 mg/L, and <0.2 mg/L, respectively, enabling reuse in fruit washing, equipment cleaning, and agricultural or aquacultural applications. A cost analysis revealed a sharp decrease in treatment cost, from $3.50/m3 at 50 L/min to $0.74/m3 at 1000 L/min, demonstrating economic viability at larger scales. Although AOP remains relatively costly, long-term cost-effectiveness can be improved through technological innovations, system integration, and operational optimisation. These findings offer a promising and sustainable approach to managing agro-industrial wastewater and conserving water resources.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 40)

Pages:

15-29

Citation:

Online since:

July 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.L. Sedlak, Water 4.0: The past, present, and future of the world's most vital resource, Yale University Press, 2019.

Google Scholar

[2] Water.org, 2021. Water Crisis - Learn About the global Water Crisis—information on ps://water.org/our-impact/water-crisis.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Vergine, C. Salerno, A. Libutti, L. Beneduce, G. Gatta, G. Berardi, A. Pollice, Closing the water cycle in the agro-industrial sector by reusing treated wastewater for irrigation, J. Clean. Prod. 164 (2017) 587–596.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.239

Google Scholar

[4] V. Shrivastava, I. Ali, M.M. Marjub, E.R. Rene, A.M.F. Soto, Wastewater in the food industry: Treatment technologies and reuse potential, Chemosphere. 293 (2022), 133553.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133553

Google Scholar

[5] T.D. Nguyen, U. Venkatadri, T. Nguyen-Quang, C. Diallo, M. Adams, Optimisation model for fresh fruit supply chains: case-study of dragon fruit in Vietnam, Agri. Eng. 2(1) (2019) 1-26.

DOI: 10.3390/agriengineering2010001

Google Scholar

[6] H.S. Nguyen, D.M. Ngo, T. O. Y. Tran, Exportation of Vietnamese dragon fruit: potentials and challenges in the next decade, Proceedings, 2020 FFTC Dragon fruit workshop and steering committee meeting: dragon fruit value chain for global markets, Taichung, Taiwan, 22-23 September 2020, 1-12.

DOI: 10.56669/ayui6435

Google Scholar

[7] K. Jalgaonkar, M.K. Mahawar, B. Bibwe, P. Kannaujia, Postharvest profile, processing and waste utilisation of dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.): A review, Food Rev. Int. 38(4) (2022) 733-759.

DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1742152

Google Scholar

[8] A.S.A. Joudah, G. Racoviteanu, The treatment of effluent from food industry using anaerobic-aerobic process with MBR system, Int. J. Engineer. Appli. Scie. 6 (2) (2019).

DOI: 10.31873/ijeas.6.2.01

Google Scholar

[9] T. Pavón-Silva, V. Pacheco-Salazar, J. Carlos Sanchez-Meza, G. Roa-Morales, A. Colín-Cruz, Physicochemical and biological combined treatment applied to a food industry wastewater for reuse, J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 44 (1) (2009), 108–115.

DOI: 10.1080/10934520802515467

Google Scholar

[10] H. El-Kamah, A. Tawfik, M. Mahmoud, H. Abdel-Halim, Treatment of high-strength wastewater from fruit juice industry using integrated anaerobic/aerobic system, Desalination. 253(1-3) (2010) 158-163.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.11.013

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Mazhar, N.A. Khan, S. Ahmed, A.H. Khan, A. Hussain, F. Changani, V. Vambol, Chlorination disinfection by-products in municipal drinking water - a review, J. Clean. Prod. 273 (2020), 123159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123159

Google Scholar

[12] M. Vourch, B. Balannec, B. Chaufer, G. Dorange, Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse, Desalination. 219 (1–3) (2008) 190–202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.013

Google Scholar

[13] D.B. Miklos, C. Remy, M. Jekel, K.G. Linden, J.E. Drewes, U. Hübner, Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment - A critical review, Water Res . 139 (2018) 118-131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042

Google Scholar

[14] U. Sathya, M. Nithya, N. Balasubramanian, Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) integrated membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the real textile wastewater treatment, JEM, 246 (2019) 768-775.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.039

Google Scholar

[15] W.M. Samhaber, M.T. Nguyen, Applicability and costs of nanofiltration in combination with photocatalysis for the treatment of dye house effluents, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 5(1) (2014) 476-484.

DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.5.55

Google Scholar

[16] D.C. Pham, T.M.D. Cao, M.C. Nguyen, T.D. Nguyen, V.H. Nguyen, V.H. Bui, T.T.T. Nguyen, Integrating Photocatalysis and Microfiltration for Methylene Blue Degradation: Kinetics and Cost Estimation, Chemical Eng. Tech. 45(10) (2022) 1748-1758.

DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202200023

Google Scholar

[17] H.M. Dang, T.H. Nguyen, D.C. Pham, T.L.P. Nguyen, T.D. Nguyen, M.T. Nguyen, T.T.T. Nguyen, Degradation of trimethoprim by advanced oxidation process using UV/TiO2 and H2O2: Kinetic and economic aspects, Vietnam J. Chem. 62(S1) (2024) 23-32.

DOI: 10.1002/vjch.202300260

Google Scholar

[18] G. Lama, J. Meijide, A. Sanromán, M. Pazos, Heterogeneous advanced oxidation processes: Current approaches for wastewater treatment, Catalysts. 12 (2022) 344.

DOI: 10.3390/catal12030344

Google Scholar

[19] G. Ruppert, R. Bauer, G. Heisler. UV-O3, UV-H2O2, UV-TiO2 and the photo-Fenton reaction-comparison of advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment, Chemosphere, 28(8) (1994) 1447-1454.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(94)90239-9

Google Scholar

[20] N.N. Mahamuni, Y.G. Adewuyi, Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: a review with emphasis on cost estimation, Ultrason. Sono. 17(6) (2010) 990-1003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005

Google Scholar

[21] A. Drews, Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors - Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures, J. Membr. Sci. 363(1-2) (2010) 1-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046

Google Scholar

[22] S. Judd, The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment, Elsevier, 2010.

Google Scholar

[23] B. Wang, S. He, L. Wang, L. Shuo, Simultaneous nitrification and de-nitrification in MBR, Water Sci. Technol. 52 (10-11) (2005) 435–442.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0721

Google Scholar

[24] M. Wagner, A. Loy, R. Nogueira, U. Purkhold, N. Lee, H. Daims, Microbial community composition and function in wastewater treatment systems, FEMS Microbiol. Rev.. 26(2) (2002) 193–214.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1020586312170

Google Scholar

[25] R. Venkatadri, R.W. Peters, Chemical oxidation technologies: ultraviolet light/hydrogen peroxide, Fenton's reagent, and titanium dioxide-assisted photocatalysis, HAZMAT. 10(2) (1993) 107-149.

DOI: 10.1089/hwm.1993.10.107

Google Scholar

[26] G.S. Wang, C.H. Liao, H.W. Chen, H.C. Yang, Characteristics of natural organic matter degradation in water by UV/H2O2 treatment, Environ. Tech. 27(3) (2006) 277-287.

Google Scholar

[27] P.M. Doran, Chapter 7 - Fluid Flow. In: Doran PM, editor. Bioprocess Engineering Principles. 2nd ed, Elsevier, Oxford, 2013, p.201–254.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-220851-5.00007-1

Google Scholar

[28] M. Rezaei, F. Rashidi, S.J. Royaee, M. Jafarikojour, Performance evaluation of a continuous flow photocatalytic reactor for wastewater treatment, ESPR. 21 (2014) 12505-12517.

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3166-3

Google Scholar

[29] V. Chakachaka, C. Tshangana, O. Mahlangu, B. Mamba, A. Muleja, Interdependence of kinetics and fluid dynamics in the design of photocatalytic membrane reactors, Membranes 12(8) (2022) 745.

DOI: 10.3390/membranes12080745

Google Scholar

[30] J.A. Malvestiti, R.F. Dantas, Modelling secondary effluents disinfection by UV/H2O2 in the presence of HO• scavengers using the ROH concept, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10(3) (2022) 107879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107879

Google Scholar

[31] Y. Zhou, Y. Water and environment innovation in Singapore and China, Water Environ. J. 35(3) (2021) 863-864.

Google Scholar

[32] T. Asano, M. Maeda, M. Takaki, Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Japan: overview and implementation examples, Water Sci. Technol. 34(11) (1996) 219-226.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1996.0283

Google Scholar

[33] Y. Luo, Fresh-cut produce wash water reuse affects water quality and packaged product quality and microbial growth in romaine lettuce, HortScience 42(6) (2007) 1413-1419.

DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.42.6.1413

Google Scholar

[34] Codex Alimentarius: Guidelines for the Safe Use and Reuse of Water in Food Production and Processing (CXG 100-2023). Codex Alimentarius Commission, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations & World Health Organisation (2003).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203490082.axa

Google Scholar

[35] TCVN 12526:2018 (ISO 20761:2018), Water reuse in urban areas – Guidelines for water reuse safety evaluation - Assessment parameters and methods, Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam (2018).

DOI: 10.3403/30325419u

Google Scholar

[36] M. Molinos-Senante, F. Hernández-Sancho, R. Sala-Garrido, R. Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: A case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants, JEM. 92(12) (2011) 3091-3097.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.023

Google Scholar

[37] K. Thirugnanasambandham, V. Sivakumar, J.P. Maran, Response surface modelling and optimisation of treatment of meat industry wastewater using electrochemical treatment method, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 46 (2015) 160–167.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2014.09.021

Google Scholar

[38] Information on https://www.light-sources.com/solutions/germicidal-uvc-lamps/uv-germicidal-lamps/low-pressure-mercury-lamps/.

Google Scholar

[39] Information on https://phoseon.com/industrial-curing/technology/led-uv-system-lifetime/.

Google Scholar

[40] J.E. Duran, M. Mohseni, F. Taghipour, Computational modelling of UV photocatalytic reactors: model development, evaluation, and application, Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 50(1) (2015) 21-33.

DOI: 10.2166/wqrjc.2014.031

Google Scholar

[41] O. Autin, J. Hart, P. Jarvis, J. MacAdam, S.A. Parsons, B. Jefferson, Comparison of UV/TiO2 and UV/H2O2 processes in an annular photoreactor for removal of micropollutants: Influence of water parameters on metaldehyde removal, quantum yields and energy consumption, Appl. Catal.., B. 138 (2013) 268-275.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.045

Google Scholar

[42] M. Čehovin, A. Medic, J. Scheideler, J. Mielcke, A. Ried, B. Kompare, A. Ž. Gotvajn, Hydrodynamic cavitation in combination with ozone, hydrogen peroxide and UV-based advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter from drinking water, Ultrason. Sono. 37 (2017) 394-404.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.036

Google Scholar

[43] D.C Pham, T.T.T. Nguyen, T.T. Bui, N.Q. Phan, M.C. Pham, M.T. Nguyen, Effect of operation parameters on the filtration behaviour in microfiltration of TiO2 suspended, JCA, 10(1) (2021) 84-92.

Google Scholar