Exploring Sacred Texts: Leveraging Computer Science for Dataset Similarity Analysis in Religious Studies

Abstract:

Studying the Quran and the Hadith side by side can help us understand that the two are fundamental and two main resources and essential wellspring of Islamic knowledge and law. There are many debates about similarities between those holy scriptures from many famous preachers and scholars. Technology can be used as an alternative solution to solve these problems. There are at least two overall approaches to determine text-similarity; the vector space model and semantic similarity —define the similarity or the distance. The similarity between words is often represented by a similarity between concepts associated with the words. This paper presents a method for identifying semantic sentence similarity among each sentence from each dataset using semantic relation of word senses between different synsets using WordNet path similarity and Wu-Palmer similarity. This method is also evaluated and has acceptable accuracy. Although both Path Similarity and Wu-Palmer Similarity successfully identify the similarity between two sentences; still, they have slightly different accuracy. The Wu-Palmer similarity is superior to path similarity when identifying sentences between Quran Sahih International and An-Nawawi Forty Hadith Translation. Looking ahead, we might be able to improve our results by using multipliers such as reverse document frequency (TF-IDF), combining the results of several steps in WordNet similarity, using vector space models, and optimal matching methods.

• Periodical: Engineering Headway (Volume 6)
• Pages: 227-235
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-kE3XmS
• Online since: April 2024
• Authors: Muhammad Raffiudin*
• Keywords: Document Comparison, Sacred Text, Semantic Similarity, WordNet, Wu-Palmer

References

[1] S. International, The Qur'an English Meaning. Jeddah, 1997.

[2] S. Wan and R. A. Angryk, "Measuring semantic similarity using WordNet-based context vectors," Conf. Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., no. January, p.908–913, 2007.

DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4413585

[3] G. Carenini, R. T. Ng, and X. Zhou, "Summarizing emails with conversational cohesion and subjectivity," ACL-08 HLT - 46th Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Hum. Lang. Technol. Proc. Conf., no. June, p.353–361, 2008.

[4] J. Shen, J. Xiao, X. He, J. Shang, S. Sinha, and J. Han, "Entity Set Search of Scientific Literature," p.565–574, 2018.

DOI: 10.1145/3209978.3210055

[5] D. Bär, T. Zesch, and I. Gurevych, "Text reuse detection using a composition of text similarity measures," 24th Int. Conf. Comput. Linguist. - Proc. COLING 2012 Tech. Pap., no. December, p.167– 184, 2012.

[6] S. M. Alzahrani, N. Salim, and A. Abraham, "Understanding plagiarism linguistic patterns, textual features, and detection methods," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev., vol. 42, no. 2, p.133–149, 2012.

DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2134847

[7] A. Visa, J. Toivonen, H. Vanharanta, and B. Back, "Contents matching defined by prototypes: Methodology verification with books of the Bible," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 18, no. 4, p.87–100, 2001.

DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045702

[8] X. Y. Liu, Y. M. Zhou, and R. S. Zheng, "Measuring semantic similarity in wordnet," Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Cybern. ICMLC 2007, vol. 6, no. August, p.3431–3435, 2007.

DOI: 10.1109/ICMLC.2007.4370741

[9] M. Alhawarat, M. Hegazi, and A. Hilal, "Processing the Text of the Holy Quran: a Text Mining Study," Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, 2015.

DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2015.060237

[10] I. Atoum and A. Otoom, "Efficient Hybrid Semantic Text Similarity using Wordnet and a Corpus," Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 7, no. 9, p.124–130, 2016.

DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070917

[11] C. Linguistics, ACL 2016 The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP. 2016.

[12] M. Farouk, "Measuring text similarity based on structure and word embedding," Cogn. Syst. Res., vol. 63, p.1–10, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2020.04.002

[13] H. Liu and P. Wang, "Assessing sentence similarity using WordNet based word similarity," J. Softw., vol. 8, no. 6, p.1451–1458, 2013.

DOI: 10.4304/jsw.8.6.1451-1458

[14] G. A. Miller, "WordNet: A Lexical Database for English," Commun. ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, p.39–41, 1995.

DOI: 10.1145/219717.219748

[15] S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper, Natural Language Processing with Python, vol. 1st. California: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2009.

[16] K. Sarkar and R. Law, "A Novel Approach to Document Classification using WordNet," p.1–14, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02755.

[17] F. Saríc, G. Glavaš, M. Karan, J. Šnajder, and B. D. Bašíc, "TakeLab: Systems for measuring semantic text similarity," *SEM 2012 - 1st Jt. Conf. Lex. Comput. Semant., vol. 2, p.441–448, 2012.

[18] H. Rubenstein and J. B. Goodenough, "Contextual correlates of synonymy," Commun. ACM, vol. 8, no. 10, p.627–633, 1965.

DOI: 10.1145/365628.365657