Tensile Strength of 3D Printing Scaffold Design Truncated Hexahedron for Tuberculosis Drug Delivery

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mechanical properties are important characteristics of scaffolds as biomaterials implant in tissue engineering. This study focused on the analysis of the tensile strength of the 3D printing scaffold with a geometric design of the truncated hexahedron unit with pore size variation and combinFive variations of pore size of the scaffold (600, 800, 1,000, 1,200, and 1,400 µm) were fabricated from Polylactide acid (PLA) filament using the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) method through an ordinary commercial 3D printer. The IBS paste was synthesized from hydroxyapatite (HA), gelatin, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and streptomycin. The characterization performed in this study were the pore size test with a digital microscope, tensile strength, elongation test, porosity, and contact angle. The 3D printed scaffold formed micropores after injected with IBS paste from a range of 130-230 µm. The tensile test results showed that the tensile strength of the 3D printing scaffold increased after being injected with IBS paste. In addition, the elongation test also shows a positive trend with increasing values of elongation after injection of IBS paste. The contact angle test results indicated that the scaffold was hydrophilic. From those characterizations, it could be concluded that 3D printing scaffold meet the criteria of scaffold for bone tissue engineering and drug carrier for tuberculosis.

You have full access to the following eBook
You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] World Health Organization, 2021. Global Tuberculosis Report 2021 (Geneva: WHO). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021.

Google Scholar

[2] Liang, X., Weiyang, Z., Zhengxue, Q., Xiao-Ji, L., and Dian-Ming, J. 2019. One-Stage Posterior Debridement with Transverse Process Strut as Bone Graft in The Surgical Treatment of Single-Segment Thoracic Tuberculosis. Medicine. 98 (47). https://doi.org/10.1097%2FMD.0000000000018022.

DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018022

Google Scholar

[3] Li, Y., Yu, B., Ai, F., Wu, C., Zhou, K., Cao, C., Li, W., 2021. Characterization and evaluation of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with extra surface morphology by cryogenic printing for bone tissue engineering. Materials & Design (205):109712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109712.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109712

Google Scholar

[4] Maulida, H., Hikmawati, D., and Budiatin, A. S. 2019. Injectable Bone Substitute Paste Based on Hydroxyapatite, Gelatin and Streptomycin for Spinal Tuberkulosis. Journal of SCRTE. 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.20473/jscrte.v3i2.20133.

DOI: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000266

Google Scholar

[5] Kim CG, Han KS, Lee S, Kim MC, Kim SY, Nah J. Fabrication of biocompatible polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite filaments for the FDM 3D printing of bone scaffolds. Appl Sci 2021;11:6351. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146351.

DOI: 10.3390/app11146351

Google Scholar

[6] Rana D., Ratheesh G., Ramakhrishna S., Ramalingam M., 2017, Nanofiber Composites in Cartilage Tissue Engineering, Nano Composites for Biomedical Applictions, 3325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100173-8.00013-2.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100173-8.00013-2

Google Scholar

[7] Patel, D.K. Lim, K.T. 2019. Biomimetic polymer-based engineered scaffolds for improved stem cell function, Materials (Basel) 12 (18). https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fma12182950.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12182950

Google Scholar

[8] ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. accessed from http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/~aborgolt/aoe3054/manual/expt5/D638.38935.pdf accessed on 24nd July 2022 at 10.09 AM.

Google Scholar

[9] Bitfab, The densities of all 3D printing materials, accessed from https://bitfab.io/blog/3d-printing-materials-densities/ accessed on 22nd July 2022 at 10.33 AM.

Google Scholar

[10] Ohman-Magi, C., Holub. O., Wu, D., Hall, R.M., Persson, C., 2021. Density and mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone-A review. JOR Spine. 4:1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1176.

DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1176

Google Scholar

[11] Zhao, H., Li, L., Ding, S., Liu, C., and Ai, J. 2018. Effect Of Porous Structure and Pore Size on Mechanical Strength of 3D-Printed Comby Scaffolds. Materials Letters. 223: 21–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.205

Google Scholar

[12] Chen, Y., Frith, J., Manshadi, A., Attar, H., Kent, D., Soro, N. D., Bermingham, M., and Dargusch, M. 2017. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of porous titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 75: 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.015

Google Scholar