A Different Empathy towards the Use of DIY Biocomposites in Design

Abstract:

The interaction of oil-based plastics with the user is limited to the sight and possibly touch, being in any case predictable and not very satisfying. Since bioplastics have been prevalently designed to fit the needs for plastic substitution, the natural elements present in it have intentionally been concealed, so that it is difficult for the user to recover the sense of what using a natural material is like, even worst of what is dealing with an upcycled waste in a material fit-for-use in design and not intended for single use. In this work, the preparation of DIY materials including different kinds of food or non-food waste according to a self-developed and tailored recipe may constitute a possibility. The surface aspect and the expressive properties of a set of twelve selected DIY materials developed in University di Camerino according to an opposite characteristics map are reported, to serve as reflection of their likely empathy content and on building a richer and more reputable interaction with materials including waste, in view of an effective upcycling process.

• Periodical: Engineering Innovations (Volume 8)
• Pages: 99-108
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-KAfT4H
• Online since: January 2024
• Authors: Carlo Santulli*
• Keywords: DIY Materials, Self-Production, Senses Interaction, Waste Upcycling

References

[1] J. Chapman, Emotionally durable design: objects, experiences and empathy. Routledge, London, 2012.

[2] E. Karana, O. Pedgley, V. Rognoli, On materials experience. Des. Issues 31(3) (2015) 16-27.

DOI: 10.1162/desi_a_00335

[3] L. Altamore, M. Ingrassia, S. Chironi, P. Columba, G. Sortino, A. Vukadin, S. Bacarella, Pasta experience: Eating with the five senses—a pilot study, AIMS Agric. Food 3 (2018) 493–520.

DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-898-8_6

[4] A. Haug, R. D. Graham, O. A. Christophersen, G. H. Lyons, How to use the world's scarce selenium resources efficiently to increase the selenium concentration in food. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 19(4) (2007) 209-228.

DOI: 10.1080/08910600701698986

[5] M. Wiberg, The materiality of interaction: Notes on the materials of interaction design. MIT press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2018.

[6] A. Ogura, K. Ito, S. Yoshida, K. Tanaka, Y. Itoh (2023). Transtiff: haptic interaction with a stick interface with various stiffness. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Emerging Technologies (pp.1-2), Los Angeles, Ca., USA.

DOI: 10.1145/3588037.3595402

[7] A. P. Graesch, C. Maynard, A. Thomas, Discard, Emotions, and Empathy on the Margins of the Waste Stream. In: Archaeologies of the Heart, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 141-161, 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36350-5_10

[8] T. Splawa-Neyman, Discussion with three jackets: Making a material ecology. Nordes (2015), 1(6), 1-10.

DOI: 10.21606/nordes.2015.005

[9] N. Biloria, (2021). From smart to empathic cities. Front. Archit. Res, 10(1), 3-16.

[10] Z. Yan, J. Cortese, I can feel your pain: investigating the role of empathy and guilt on sustainable behavioral intentions to reduce, reuse, and recycle plastic bags among college students. Sustainability 15(8) (2023) 6572.

DOI: 10.3390/su15086572

[11] I. Paris, Domestic appliances and industrial design: the Italian white-goods industry during the 1950s and 1960s. Technol. Cult. 57 (3) (2016) 612-648.

DOI: 10.1353/tech.2016.0073

[12] L. Sossini, R. Santi, B. Del Curto (2022). The Colours of Sustainability: how materials CMF Design can guide sustainable perceptions and behaviours. In Colour and Colorimetry. Multidisciplinary Contributions (Vol. 17, pp.277-284). Andrea Siniscalco.

[13] M. Wijaya, D. Lau, S. Horrocks, F. McGlone, H. Ling, A. Schirmer, The human "feel" of touch contributes to its perceived pleasantness. J. Exp.Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 46(2)(2020). 155.

DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000705

[14] S. Kabasci, Biobased plastics. In Plastic waste and recycling (pp.67-96). Academic Press, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817880-5.00004-9

[15] C. Cecchini, Bioplastics made from upcycled food waste. Prospects for their use in the field of design. Des. J. 20(sup1) (2017) S1596-S1610.

DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352684

[16] R. Mülhaupt, Green polymer chemistry and bio‐based plastics: dreams and reality. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214(2) (2013) 159-174.

DOI: 10.1002/macp.201200439

[17] C. Santulli, V. Rognoli, Material tinkering for design education on waste upcycling. Design Technol. Ed. 25 (2020) 50-73.

[18] E. O. Espinoza, B. W. Baker, C. A. Berry, The analysis of sea turtle and bovid keratin artefacts using drift spectroscopy and discriminant analysis. Archaeometry 49(4) (2007) 685-698.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00328.x

[19] D. Tristantini, A. Yunan, Characterization of cellulose acetate based on empty fruit bunches and dried jackfruit leaves as replacement candidates for microbeads. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 67, p.04024). EDP Sciences, 2018.

DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20186704024

[20] K. Fletcher, Durability, fashion, sustainability: The processes and practices of use. Fash. Pract. 4 (2012) 221-238.

[21] A. Al-Hamrani, M. Kucukvar, W. Alnahhal, E. Mahdi, N. C. Onat, Green concrete for a circular economy: A review on sustainability, durability, and structural properties. Materials 14(2021) 351.

DOI: 10.3390/ma14020351

[22] Y. Chen, A. K. Awasthi, F. Wei, Q. Tan, J. Li, Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 752 (2021) 141772.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141772

[23] B. Sharma, S. Shekhar, S. Sharma, P. Jain, The paradigm in conversion of plastic waste into value added materials. Clean. Eng. Technol. 4 (2021) 100254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100254

[24] A. Krawczyk, N. Jaguszewska, W. Ziółkiewicz, M. Grodzińska-Jurczak, The ivory tower of academia in the era of climate change: European scientists' engagement in science popularization related to single-use plastics. Environ. Sci. Policy 146 (2023) 185-202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.016

[25] J.M.F. Mendoza, F. D'aponte, D. Gualtieri, A. Azapagic, Disposable baby diapers: Life cycle costs, eco-efficiency and circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 211 (2019) 455-467.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.146

[26] X. Qi, P. P. Liu (2021, November). Construal Level and Guilt Promote Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention: Based on Analysis of Variance. In 2021 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Education (ICISE-IE) (pp.743-748). IEEE.

DOI: 10.1109/icise-ie53922.2021.00173

[27] M.E. Ntekpe, E.O. Mbong, E.N. Edem, S. Hussain, Disposable diapers: impact of disposal methods on public health and the environment. Am. J. Med. Public Health 1 (2) (2020) 1009.

[28] A.P. Bortoleto, Waste prevention policy and behaviour: New approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts. Routledge, London, 2014.

[29] S. Nichols, Young children and sustainable consumption: An early childhood education agenda. In Designing for Zero Waste (pp.53-66). Routledge, London, 2013.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203146057-14

[30] S.K. Jha, S. Veeramani, Sorting responsible business practices in fast fashion: a case study of Zara. J. Manage. Public Policy 12(2) (2021) 54-58.

DOI: 10.47914/jmpp.2020.v12i2.004

[31] U. Dandavate, E. B. N. Sanders, S. Stuart (1996, October). Emotions matter: User empathy in the product development process. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 40, No. 7, pp.415-418). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

DOI: 10.1177/154193129604000709

[32] D McDonagh, J. Thomas, Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation. Australas. Med. J. 3(8) (2010) 458-464.

DOI: 10.4066/amj.2010.391

[33] G. Hawkins, Plastics in: Fueling Culture: 101 Words for Energy and Environment, I. Szeman, J. Wenzel, & P. Yaeger (Eds.), Fordham University Press, 2017, 271-274.

DOI: 10.1515/9780823273935

[34] J. Newlin, G. A. Jimenez, D. Hester, L. M. Blank (2010). Thin marble facades: History, evaluation, and maintenance. In: Structures Congress 2010 (pp.1051-1062).

DOI: 10.1061/41130(369)95

[35] R. Proctor (2015). The sustainable design book. Hachette UK.

[36] J. Park, S. H. Han, A fuzzy rule-based approach to modeling affective user satisfaction towards office chair design. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom 34. (2004) 31-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.01.006

[37] I. Confente, D. Scarpi, I. Russo, Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value. J. Bus. Res. 112 (2020) 431-439.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030

[38] A. Boetzkes, A. Pendakis, Visions of eternity: Plastic and the ontology of oil. E-Flux Magazine (2013) 47.

[39] M.Q. Zhang, M.Z. Rong, X. Lu, Fully biodegradable natural fiber composites from renewable resources: all-plant fiber composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65(15-16) (2005) 2514-2525.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.018

[40] F. Scognamiglio, D. M. Gattia, G. Roselli, F. Persia, U. De Angelis, C. Santulli, Thermoplastic Starch (TPS) films added with mucilage from Opuntia Ficus Indica: Mechanical, microstructural and thermal characterization. Materials 13(4) (2020) 1000.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13041000

[41] B.E. Teixeira-Costa, C.T. Andrade, C.T. Chitosan as a valuable biomolecule from seafood industry waste in the design of green food packaging. Biomolecules, 11(11) (2021). 1599.

DOI: 10.3390/biom11111599

[42] M. Bootklad, K. Kaewtatip, Biodegradation of thermoplastic starch/eggshell powder composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 97(2) (2013) 315-320.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.030

[43] E. Karana, D. Blauwhoff, E. J. Hultink, S. Camere, When the material grows: A case study on designing (with) mycelium-based materials. Int. J. Des.  12(2) (2018) 119-136.

[44] J. Fike, Industrial hemp: renewed opportunities for an ancient crop. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 35 (5-6) (2016) 406-424.

DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2016.1257842

[45] C. Ayala-Garcia, V. Rognoli, The new aesthetic of DIY-materials. Des. J. 20 (sup1) (2017) S375-S389.

DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352905