Paper Titles

Acute Effects of Different Stretching Techniques on Lower Limb Kinematics, Kinetics and Muscle Activities during Vertical Jump
p.1

The Influence of the Improvement of Calf Strength on Barefoot Loading
p.16

Numerical Analysis of the Biomechanical Behavior for both Kinds of Dental Structures
p.26

Emerging Applications of Optical Bio-Sensors
p.41

Fiber-Optic Breath Sensors: A Comparison Study
p.56

Methods of Power Line Interference Elimination in EMG Signal
p.64

Separation Enhancement of Power Line Noise from Human ECG Signal Based on Stone Technique
p.71

An Efficient MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation by the Fusion of Active Contour Model and Self-Organizing-Map
p.79

Effects of Pretreatment Methods on the Enamel Surface Improving Sealant Adhesion
p.92

HomeJournal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Numerical Analysis of the Biomechanical Behavior...

Numerical Analysis of the Biomechanical Behavior for both Kinds of Dental Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of the present study is to investigate the comparison between the biomechanical behavior of the dental prosthesis composed of three implants replacing successively the premolar and two molars and the dental bridge located between two implants. Both dental structures were subjected to the same masticatory loading (Corono-apical, Linguo-buccal and Disto- mesial). Three-dimensional finite element models of dental structures were developed to determine the stress distribution under simulated applied loads. In this study the biomechanical behavior of prosthetics dental crowns subjected to static loads in contact with the jawbone has been highlighted. Biomechanical simulations indicated that the equivalent stresses in the dental bridge are greater than that produced in the dental prosthesis. The dental bridge can be assimilated to a beam at the embedded ends, subjected to the bending.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 40

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 40)

Pages:

26-40

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.40.26

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2019

Authors:

Kheira Bouzouina, Sadek Gouasmi, Djebbar Noureddine*, Chelahi Chiker Yamina

Keywords:

Dental Bridge, Dental Prosthesis, Finite Element Method, Mandibular Bone, Von Mises Stress

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Nancy, D. Clelland, , MSD. «Removable vs fixed bridge" - Part 1. http://www.netwellness.org/question.cfm/33417.htm. Accessed 26/7/2009. (2005).

[2] J. A. Soncini, et al., Direct and indirect restorative materials,. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 134, 463-472.

[3] H. T. Shillingburg, et al. «Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics". 3ed edition. North Kimberly Drive. Quintessence Publication. (1997), 80-86.

[4] S. W. Chang, D.W. Dental prosthesis for missing teeth, http://www.aboutwe.com/Pg2012,13,1420Excellence20H.pdf.Accessed. 13/7/2009. (2008).

[5] W.Y. Lam, Botelho M.G, Mc Grath C.P. Longevity of implant crowns and 2-unit cantilevered bonded bridges.Clin Oral Implants Res; 24 (12): (2013), 1369-74.

DOI: 10.1111/clr.12034

[6] A.Sharma, G.R. Rahul, S.T. Poduval, Shetty K.Assessment of various factors for feasibility of fixed Cantilever bridge: a review study. ISRN Dent 2012;(2012):259891.

DOI: 10.5402/2012/259891

[7] A. Lanier Advantages and disadvantages of dental bridges, http://www.dentaldepartures.com/ article/procedures/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-dental-bridges/ Accessed 1/1/2012. (2012).

[8] A. Geramy, SM. Morgano. Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown,. Journal of Prosthetic Dental; 92(5), (2004) 434-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.011

[9] S. Yokoyama, N. Wakabayashi, M. Shiota, Ohyama. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures,. International Journal Oral Maxillofaciale Implants, 20(4), (2005) 578–83.

[10] D. Bozkaya, S. Muftu, A. Muftu. «Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis". Journal of Prosthetic Dental, 92, (2004) 523–30.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.024

[11] C. Lídia, A. Ramos, Simões. A Finite element analysis of a dental implant system with an elastomeric stress barrier,, summer bioengineering conference, June, 25–29, Sonesta Beach Resort in Key Biscayne, Florida. (2003).

[12] E. W. Skinner Sciences des matériaux dentaires,. 6ème édition Paris: Prélat. (1971).

[13] N. Djebbar, B. Serier, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, S. Benbarek, A. Drai Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant,. Material Design, 31, (2010) 2097–100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.042

[14] SJ. Hoshaw, JB. Brunski, GVB. Cochran. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodelling,. International Journal Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 9(3), (1994) 345–60.

[15] H. Spiekermann. Color atlas of dental medicine: implantology,. New York: Thieme;. (1995). https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0028.

[16] OA. Abu-Hammad, A. Harrison, D. Williams. The effect of a hidroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone,. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 15(4), (2000) 559–64.

[17] JB. Brunski. Biomechanics of dental implants,. In: Block MS, Kent JN, Guerra LR editors. Implants in dentistry: essentials of endosseous implants for maxillofacial reconstruction. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, (1997) 63–71.

[18] CE. Misch, MW. Bidez. A scientific rationale for dental implant design,. In: Misch CE editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; (2007) 329–44.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-07845-0.00015-4

[19] E. Fernàndez, FJ. Gil, C. Aparicio, M. Nilsson, S. Sarda, D. Rodriguez. Materials in dental implantology,. In: Natali AN, editor. Dental biomechanics. London: Taylor & Francis. (2003).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203514849.ch5

[20] AN. Natali, PG. Pavan. Numerical approach to dental biomechanics,. In: Natali AN, editor. Dental biomechanics. London: Taylor & Francis; (2003).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203514849-14

[21] AN. Natali, PG. Pavan. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants,. Comput Methods Biomech Eng 5, (2002)127–33.

DOI: 10.1080/10255840290032144

[22] T. Achour , A. Merdji, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, B. Serier,N. Djebbar. Stress distribution in dental implant with elastomeric stress barrier,, Materials and Design 32; (2011) 282-290.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.053

[23] AK. Patra, JM. Depaolo, D'Souza KS, D. Detolla, MA. Meenaghan. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants,. Implant Dent, 7(4), (1998) 355–68.

DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199807040-00015

[24] L. Minatel, F. Ramos Verri, G. Abu Halawa Kudo, D. Augusto de Faria Almeida, Victor Eduardo de Souza Batista, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior, Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses,, Materials Science and Engineering C 71, (2017) 35–42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.062

[25] HJ. Meijer, FJ. Starmans, WH. Steen, F. Bosman. A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible,. Arch Oral Biol, 38(6), (1993) 491–6.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(93)90185-o

[26] R. Razaghi, M. Mallakzadeh and M. Haghpanahi Dynamic simulation and finite element analysis of the maxillary bone injury around dental implant during chewing different food ,. Biomedical Engineering Applications Basis and Communications, 28(2), (2016) 14-24.

DOI: 10.4015/s1016237216500149

[27] F. Ramos Verri, J.F. Santiago Junior, D.A. de Faria Almeida, G.B. de Oliveira, V.E. de Souza Batista, H.Marques Honorio, P.Y. Noritomi, E.P. Pellizzer, Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test,, J. Biomech. 48, (2015) 138–145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021

[28] N. Djebbar, B. Serier and B. Bachir Bouiadjra Stress Distribution of the Variable Dynamic Loading in the Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,. Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, 31(2017), 44-52.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbbe.31.44

[29] HH. Ammar, P. Ngan, RJ. Crout, VH. Mucino, OM. Mukdadi, Three dimensional modeling and ﬁnite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement,. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop, 139(2011), 59-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.020

[30] O.Kayabasi, E.Yuzbasioglu, F.Erzincanli, Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviours of dental implant using finite element method,, Adv Eng Softw, 37(2006), 58-649.

[31] Z.Miller, MB.Fuchs, M.Arcan, Trabecular bone adaptation with an orthotropic material model,, J.Biomech, 35(2002), 247–56.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00192-0

[32] C. Wang, G. Fu, F. Deng, Difference of natural teeth and implant-supported restoration: A comparison of bone remodeling simulations,. Journal of Dental Sciences, 14 (2015), 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.001

[33] AS. Bonnet, M. Postaire, P. Lipinski. Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge: finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position,. Med Eng Phys, 31, (2009) 806–15.

DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.01.002

[34] N. Wakabayashi, M. Ona, T. Suzuki, Y. Igarashi. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications,. J Dent 36, (2008) 463–471.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.010

[35] T. Li, L. Kong, Y. Wang, K. Hu, L. Song, B. Liu, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis,. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 38, (2009) 1077–83.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.001

[36] F. Hild et S. Roux, Imagerie 3D en mécanique des materiaux. Section Corrélation d'images volumiques. Publisher traite MIM (Hermes). Editor Buffiere, J.-Y., Maire, E.. (2014).

[37] W. Wang et al. A new method combining finite element analysis and digital image correlation to assess macroscopic mechanical properties of dentin. Materials, 8(2): (2015) 535-550.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8020535

[38] JP. Geng, KB. Tan, GR. Liu. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature,. J Prosthet Dent 85(6), (2001) 585–98.

[39] CM. Jeong, AA. Caputo, RS. Wylie, SC. Son, YC. Jeon. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer,. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(1), (2003) 59–65.

[40] PI. Brånemark, GA. Zarb, T. Albrektsson. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry,. Chicago: Quintessence (1985).

[41] AN. Natali, PG. Pavan, AL. Ruggero Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis,. Dent Mater 22, (2006) 388–95.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.08.001

[42] UR. Benzing, IH. Gall, IH. Weber. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae,. Int J Oral Maxillfac Implants 10, (1995) 188–98.

DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199500440-00024

[43] S. Ishigaki, T. Nakano, S. Yamada, T. Nakamura, F. Takashima. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing,. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14, (2003) 97-102.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140113.x

[44] M. Sifi ; A. Merdji ; F. Benkhenafou ; D. Bennacer ; M. Benaissa ; N. Benseddiq. Comportementmécanique de la prothèse dentaire Sous l,effet des efforts masticatoires. Nature & Technology (2015).

[45] AL. Sabatini, T. Goswami. Hip implants VII: finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections,. Mater Des 29, (2008) 438–1446.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.09.002

[46] I. Akpinar, F. Demire, L. Parnas, S. Sahin A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal - extension fixed prostheses,. Quintessence Int 27, (1996) 11–7.

[47] B. Rangert, PHJ. Krogh , B. Langer, NV. Roekel Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis,. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10, (1995) 326-334.