Optimization of Strength & Roughness for Vapor Smoothened FDM Fabricated PLA Parts through Exposure Time and Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is considered a vital ingredient in Industry 4.0. Its manner of production is depositing material on a layer-on-layer basis. However, this manner of production normally generates undesirable layer lines. A common solution used to address this is a technique known as Vapor Smoothing (VS). VS is a modern process where chemical vapor is produced to contact the surface of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) fabricated parts. This would result in the disruption of part’s outer layers resulting in smoothening of its surface. This type of study has abundant Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)-based research but currently lacks Polylactic Acid (PLA). Roughness is only one of the common criteria for a good FDM fabricated PLA part. Mechanical strength should also be considered as an acceptance criterion. Having said this, characterization such as Optical Microscopy with ImageJ processing; and tensile testing via Universal Testing Machine (UTM) were utilized. This research introduced a calculated response where good roughness can be attained without sacrificing too much strength in the form of an S/R ratio. It was identified that optimum vapor smoothing parameters are 55 degrees C with an exposure time of 4-min, where we were able to attain a roughness from 10.600 to 3.999 um roughness while having a reduction of strength from 46.1 to 42.7 MPa. As part of our recommendation, it would enhance the study if other characterization methods may also be applied to cite the effects of VS on mechanical properties such as fatigue, and flexural and compressive testing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

45-50

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.S. Sandhu, K.S. Boparai and K.S. Sandhu, "Effect of slicing parameters on surface roughness of fused deposition modeling prints," in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.047

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Tao, F. Kong, Z. Li, J. Zhang, X. Zhao, Q. Yin, D. Xing and P. Li, "A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication," Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 15, pp.4860-4879, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108

Google Scholar

[3] D. Singh, R. Singh and K. S. Boparai, "Development and surface improvement of FDM pattern based investment casting of biomedical implants: A state of art review," Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, pp.80-95, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.026

Google Scholar

[4] J. Chacón, M. Caminero, E. García-Plaza and P. Núñez, "Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection," Materials & Design, vol. 124, pp.143-157, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065

Google Scholar

[5] K. Mustapha and K. M. Metwalli, "A review of fused deposition modelling for 3D printing of smart polymeric materials and composites," European Polymer Journal, vol. 156, p.110591, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110591

Google Scholar

[6] A. P. B. M. Valerga, S. R. Fernandez-Vidal and A. J. Gamez, "Impact of Chemical Post-Processing in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) on Polylactic Acid (PLA) Surface Quality and Structure," Polymers 11, p.566, 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/polym11030566

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Jin, Y. Wan, Z.B. and Z. Liu, "Modeling of the chemical finishing process for polylactic acid parts in fused deposition modeling and investigation of its tensile properties," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 240, pp.233-239, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.003

Google Scholar

[8] S. Panda, R. Chabra, S. Kapil and V. Patel, "Chemical vapour treatment for enhancing the surface finish of PLA object produced by fused deposition method using the Taguchi optimization method," Springer Nature Applied Science, vol. 2, p.916, 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2740-1

Google Scholar

[9] F. Lavecchia, M.G. Guerra and L.M. Galantucci, "Chemical vapor treatment to improve surface finish of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) parts realized by fused filament fabrication," Progress in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp.65-75, 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-021-00213-2

Google Scholar

[10] M.T. Birosz, D. Ledenyák and M. Andó, "Effect of FDM infill patterns on mechanical properties," Polymer Testing, vol. 113, p.107654, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654

Google Scholar

[11] M. Fernandez-Vicente, W. Calle, S. Ferrandiz and A. Conejero, "Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing," 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, vol. 3, no. 3, pp.183-192, 2016.

DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0036

Google Scholar

[12] B. Aloyaydi, S. Sivasankaran and A. Mustafa, "Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid," Polymer Testing, vol. 87, p.106557, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557

Google Scholar