Comparative Study by Thermal Analysis of Four Different Kinds of Wood

Abstract:

Article Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 230-232)

Edited by:

Teresa Vieira

Pages:

319-322

Citation:

R. Losada et al., "Comparative Study by Thermal Analysis of Four Different Kinds of Wood", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 230-232, pp. 319-322, 2002

Online since:

October 2002

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] P. Aggarwal, D. Dollimore and K. Heon: Journal of Thermal Analysis Vol. 50 (1997), pp.7-17.

[2] J.A. Conesa, J.A. Caballero, A. Marcilla, R. Font: Thermochemical Acta Vol. 254 (1995), pp.175-192.

[3] J. Kaloustian, A. M. Pauli, J. Pastor: Journal of Thermal Analysis Vol. 46 (1996), pp.91-104.

[4] C.M. Tian, Z.H. Shi, H.Y. Zhang, J.Z. Xu, J.R. Shi, H.Z. Guo: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Vol.

[55] - issue 1 (1999), pp.93-98. Zone Weight Loss (%) H (J/g) n (apar. ) Ea (kJ/mol) A (s -1) r.

[2] 55. 178 843. 52 0. 61 95183 1. 19 0. 9815 Castanea.

[3] 84. 518 3. 10E+04 -1. 04 8. 7026 1. 37 0. 9295.

[2] 65. 893 218. 88 0. 79 105 1. 1E+07 0. 9780 Eucalyptus.

[3] 80. 519 4. 79E+04 Bad correlation.

[2] 65. 447 353. 65 -2. 60 38 1. 70 0. 9990 Pinus.

[3] 84. 528 5. 41E+04 Bad correlation.

[2] 65. 760 400. 41 0. 68 11294 1. 32 0. 9661 Quercus.

[3] 71. 420 1939. 74 Bad correlation Zone Weight Loss (%) H (J/g) n (apar. ) Ea (kJ/mol) A (s -1) r Castanea 2 53. 413 39. 88 0. 58 83300 1. 084 0. 9934 Eucalyptus 2 70. 962 342. 22 0. 47 76 5. 6E+04 0. 9583 Pinus 2 77. 912 271. 84 -0. 44 34 5. 5E+04 0. 9713 Quercus 2 71. 945 462. 50 0. 41 72620 1. 179 0. 9606.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.