Fracture Toughness Properties of the Heat-Affected-Zone in Ferritic Steel Weldments

[2] K H Schwalbe, Y J Kim, A Cornec and M Kocak, EFAM ETM-MM 96: The ETM Method for Assessing the Significance of Crack-Like Defects in Joints with Mechanical Heterogeneity (Strength and Mismatch), Eds K H Schwalbe, and M Kocak, GKSS Research Centre Pub. GKSS/97/E/9, Geesthact FRG, (1996).

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00112.x

Google Scholar

[3] C Thaulow and M Toyoda, EFAM ETH-MM 99, Mismatching of Interfaces in Welds, Eds K H Schwalbe and M Kocak, GKSS Research Centre Pub., Geesthact FRG, 1999, p.75.

Google Scholar

[4] P E J Flewitt, Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Ed. Bakker A, Delft Univ. Press (Delft) 1995, p.143.

Google Scholar

[5] I Milne and D A Curry, Proceedings of International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, Inst. of Mech. Eng., London, (1980).

Google Scholar

[6] C Fossati and S Ragazzonit, Welding International, No. 12 (1988), p.1091.

Google Scholar

[7] ESIS Procedure for Determining the Fracture Toughness of Materials. European Structural Integrity Society, Document ESIS, 2, (1992).

Google Scholar

[8] B K Neale, D A Curry, G Green, J R Haigh, and K N Akhurst, Int.J. of Pressure Vessels and Piping. Vol. 20 (1985), p.155.

DOI: 10.1016/0308-0161(85)90037-7

Google Scholar

[9] R Moskovic, N O'Dowd and P E J Flewitt, Smirt 18, Prague, 2003 (To be published).

Google Scholar

[10] A.L. Gurson, J. Eng. Materials and Technology, Vol. 99 (1997), p.2.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Needleman, and V Tvergaard, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol. 32 (1984), p.461.

Google Scholar

[12] F A McClintock and G R Irwin, Fracture Toughness Testing and its Applications, ASTM STP 381, ASTM, (Phila). 1965, p.84.

Google Scholar

[13] R Moskovic, L F Exworthy, and B J C Ellis, Fracture Toughness of HAZ in Ducol w30 and BW87A Plate Steels, TE/SXA/REP/0087/97, (1997).

Google Scholar

[14] G Wardle, R P Birkett and B K Neale, Mismatching of Interface and Welds, Ed. K H Schwalbe and M Kocak, GKSS Research Centre Pub., Geesthacht, FRG, 1999, p.371.

01.

16.

25.

33.

41.

50.