Integration of Landsat ETM+ and Radarsat SAR Data for Land Cover Classification

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aims to analyze the synergic effect of integrating two distinctive satellite remote sensor data (optical and microwave imagery) for land cover classification. The study area covers diverse land cover types in the Western coastal region of the Korean peninsula. Eleven land cover types were classified using several datasets of combined Landsat ETM+ and Radarsat synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data as well as only a single dataset of either ETM+ or SAR data alone. Furthermore, we introduced a texture image that was derived from the SAR data. The synergic effect of these combined datasets was evident by both image interpretation and computerassisted classification. The overall classification accuracy of the combined datasets was improved to 74.60% as compared to the 69.35% accuracy of using ETM+ data alone.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Pages:

838-844

Citation:

Online since:

January 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Lopez, R. Touzi and E. Nezry: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Vol. 28 (1990), pp.992-1000.

DOI: 10.1109/36.62623

Google Scholar

[2] B.N. Haack et al.: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 66 (2000), p.709716.

Google Scholar

[3] B.N. Haack et al.: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 68 (2002), pp.1289-1296.

Google Scholar

[4] D.G. Leckie: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 56 (1900), pp.1237-1246.

Google Scholar

[5] D.R. Peddle and S.E. Franklin: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 57 (1991), pp.413-420.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Dell'Acqua: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Vol. 41 (2003), pp.153-159.

Google Scholar

[7] J.F. Paris and H.H. Kwong: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 54 (1988), pp.1187-1193.

Google Scholar

[8] J.R. Jensen: Introductory Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996).

Google Scholar

[9] K. Wikantika, A.B. Harto and R. Tateishi: Processing of IECI Japan Workshop. Vol. 3 (2001), pp.145-147.

Google Scholar

[10] M.J. Collins: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Vol. 38 (2000), pp.1160-1170.

Google Scholar

[11] P.H. Swan and S.M. David: Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach (McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, 1978).

Google Scholar

[12] P.W. Mueller and R.N. Hoffer: Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. Vol. 55 (1989), pp.887-895.

Google Scholar

[13] R.J. Dekker: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Vol. 41 (2003), p.1950- (1958).

Google Scholar

[14] S.H. Kim and K.S. Lee: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Remote Sensing and the 2003 International Symposium on Remote Sensing. Vol. 1 (2003), pp.225-227.

Google Scholar