Dynamic Analysis of a Biglide Parallel Grinder

Ping Zou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.291-292.495

Paper Titles

Influence of Material of Small Radius Ball End Mill on Cutting Accuracy in Deep Precision Machining
p.471

Study on Surface Integrity of PTFE Finished by Ultra-Precision Cutting and Surface Performance
p.475

Comparative Study on Machining the Internal Stationary Toroidal Gear
p.483

Studies on NC Machining for Cylindrical Cams
p.489

Dynamic Analysis of a Biglide Parallel Grinder
p.495

A New Architecture of Tool Path Generation for Five-Axis Control Machining
p.501

Development of Orthogonal Impact Cutting Testing Machine
p.507

Research of the Technological Parameters Influencing on the Surface Quality of Micro Complex Surface
p.513

The Effect of Secondary Piezoelectric Effect on the Measuring Precision of Quartz Dynamometers
p.519

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 291-292Dynamic Analysis of a Biglide Parallel Grinder

Dynamic Analysis of a Biglide Parallel Grinder

Abstract:

In this paper, the moving platform of the biglide parallel grinder with six degrees of freedom will keep moving horizontally at any time using parallelograms. Besides grinding the helical drill point, this grinder also can work as drilling and welding machine tool as well as a CMM. The joint-velocity Jacobian matrix is calculated. Moreover, the dynamic equations are derived by applying the Lagrangian formulation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 291-292)

Pages:

495-500

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.291-292.495

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2005

Authors:

Ping Zou

Keywords:

Biglide, Dynamic, Grinding Machine Tools, Parallel Manipulator

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] J. Tlusty, J. Ziegert and S. Ridgeway: Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 48 (1999), No. 1, pp.351-356.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63200-4

Google Scholar

[2] P. Wenger, C. Gosselin and B. Maille: Proc of PKM'99, Milan, Italy, 1999, pp.23-32.

Google Scholar

[3] D. Chablat and P. Wenger: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 19 (2003), No. 3, pp.403-410.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Honegger, A. Codourey and E. Burdet: Proc of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1997, pp.543-548.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. K. Yiu and Z. X. Li: Proc of International Conference on Mechatronics Technology, Singapore, 2001, pp.339-344.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Angeles, G. Yang and I-M. Chen: IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 8 (2003), No. 4, pp.469-475.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Gosselin and J. Angeles: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 6 (1990), No. 3, pp.281-290.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Zou: Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 202-203 (2001), pp.447-450.

Google Scholar