Inhibiting Effect of Mineral Powder on Sulfate Attack of Cement Mortar

Article Preview

Abstract:

ASTM C1012 and GB2420 method were employed to evaluate the inhibiting effect of different mineral admixtures on sulfate attack of cement mortar, and the mass loss of mortar specimens after drying-wetting cycles was measured for comparison. It is shown that all the mineral admixtures, including ground blast furnace slag (SL), fly ash (FA), natural zeolite (NZ) and metakaolin (MK) were effective in decreasing the 15-week expansion and increasing the corrosion resistance coefficient of the specimens immersed in Na2SO4 solution. The wetting and drying test however, showed inconsistent result, as both physical and chemical attack may soon occur due to quick accumulation of sulfate by capillary absorption instead of diffusion mechanism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 302-303)

Pages:

73-78

Citation:

Online since:

January 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Adam Neville: The confused world of sulfate attack on concrete, Cement and Concrete research, Vol. 34 (2004), pp.1275-1296.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.004

Google Scholar

[2] P.W. Brown: Thaumasite formation and other forms of sulfate attack, guest editorial, Cem. Concr. Compos. 24 (3- 4) (2002), pp.301-303.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00081-6

Google Scholar

[3] K. Torii, K. Taniguchi, M. Kawamura: Sulfate resistance of high fly ash content concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, 25(1995) 4, pp.759-768.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00066-l

Google Scholar

[4] E.F. Irassar, A. Di Maio, O.R. Batic: Sulfate attack on concrete with mineral admixtures, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 26(1996) 1, pp.113-123.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00195-6

Google Scholar

[5] Karthik H. Obla, Russell L. Hill, Michael D. A Thomas, et al.: Properties of Concrete Containing Ultrafine Fly Ash, ACI materials journal, Vol. 100(5), pp.426-433.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Doug Hooton, John J. Emery: Sufate resistance of a Canadian slag cement, ACI materials journal, Vol. 87(6), p.547-555.

Google Scholar

[7] Menashi D. Cohen, Arnon Bentur: Durability of Portland cement -silica fume paste in magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate solution, ACI materials journal, Vol. 85(3): 148-157.

DOI: 10.14359/1809

Google Scholar

[8] J.M. Khatib, S. Wild: Sulfate resistance of metakaolin mortar, Cement and Concrete Research, 28(1), pp.82-92.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(97)00210-x

Google Scholar

[9] D.M. Roy, P. Arjunan, M.R. Silsbee: Effect of Silica Fume, Metakaolin, and Low-calcium Fly Ash on Chemical Resistance of Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 31 (2001), pp.1809-1813.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00548-8

Google Scholar

[10] Mehta, P.K.: Sulfate Attack on Concrete. A critical review, Proc. Int. sem. Durab. Monterey, 1993, pp.106-132.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Wild, J.M. Khatib: Portlandite Consumption in Metakaolin Cement Pastes and Mortars, Cement and Concrete Research, 1997 (1), pp.137-146.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(96)00187-1

Google Scholar

[12] Dunstan E.R. Jr.: Performance of Lignite and Subbituminous Fly Ash in Concrete-A Progress Report, US bureau of reclamation REC-ERC-76-1, (1976).

Google Scholar