Analysis of Optimal Clamping Schemes for Aero-Multi-Frame Monolithic Components

Article Preview

Abstract:

Many thin-walled aero-parts have complex structure, and high machining accuracy is required. But because of their poor rigidity, it is easy to bring machining deformation caused by the existence of the clamping residual stress, and influences machining accuracy of workpiece. At the present time it is a focal point how to reduce the deformation the machined surface. Present studies mainly focus on the influences of clamping points, clamping order and clamping force on residual stresses. It is few studied for clamping schemes how to influence the residual stresses and the fatigue resistance of the machined parts. To reflect the relationship between clamping schemes and residual stresses and fatigue resistance, finite element models with different clamping schemes were built and the clamping process was simulated. A conclusion is obtained that it is advisable to adopt even and symmetry distributed clamps and multi-point clamps to reduce the workpiece distortion of aero-multi-frame components due to the clamping. This study conclusion has been validated by the actual production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 375-376)

Pages:

445-448

Citation:

Online since:

March 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Wang: Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 4 (1998) No. 4, pp.28-30. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Guo, D.W. Zuo and W. Yu: ICPMT'2004 (Suzhou, China, 2004). pp.730-734. path Z X Y Node Scheme ① Scheme ② Scheme ③ ① ② ③ ④.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Ratchev, S. Liu, and W. Huang: International Journal of Machine Tool & Manufacture, Vol. 44(2004) pp.1629-1641.

Google Scholar

[4] R.J. Menassa: Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 113(1991) pp.412-418.

Google Scholar

[5] H.Y. Dong, Y.L. Ke, Q. Wu, and D. Xu: Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinaica, Vol. 24 (2003) No. 4, pp.1-2. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] J.Y. Cheng, G.Z. Cai: Ansys Operating Guide(Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2001). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Z.Y. Mei, Y.Q. Wang, and Y.Q. Fan: Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, Vol. 40(2005) No. 2, pp.23-27. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] O. Tugrul, Z. Erol: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering of Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 128 (2006) No. 2, pp.119-129.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Utsunomiya, P. Hartley, and I. Pillinger: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering of Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 123 (2001) No. 11, pp.397-404.

Google Scholar

[10] J.S. Erik, K. Vinod and S. Kee: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering of Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 123 (2001), No. 11, pp.576-581.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Guo. Study on Mechanism and Prediction Analysis of Machining Distortion for Aero-multi-frame Monolithic Structure Parts (Ph.D., Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, China 2006. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] H. Guo, D.W. Zuo, and S.H. Wang: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 315-316(2006), pp.174-179.

Google Scholar