Review of Experimental Models for Confirmation of Mathematical Models of Gears

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to calculate the service life as precisely and reliably as possible we need good mathematical models for describing loading, geometry, properties of materials and fracture mechanics parameters. It can be established whether a mathematical model is precise and reliable only by comparison of results of the method such as analytical methods in case of simple problems and experiment when real complex structure are deal with. Since gears and gearing belong to the second group, by correctly selected and developed test pieces and carefully planned experiments we obtained results with which we confirmed and justified the mathematical model for calculating mentioned parameters. To this end we will show in this paper series of experimental methods and test pieces used on the gears.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 385-387)

Pages:

345-348

Citation:

Online since:

July 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Taylor and J. F. Knott: Fatigue crack propagation behaviour of short crack; the effect of microstructure, Fatigue Engn. Mater. Struct. 4, 147 - 155, (1981).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1981.tb01116.x

Google Scholar

[2] B. Aberšek, and J. Flašker: How gears break, Wit Press, Southampton, Boston (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] M.F. Kanninen: Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford Press, New York (1985).

Google Scholar

[4] B. Aberšek, J. Flašker and S. Glodež: Review of mathematical and experimental models for determination of service life of gears. Eng. fract. mech. vol. 71, iss. 4/6, 439-453, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00050-x

Google Scholar

[5] B. Aberšek and J. Flašker: Numerical methods for evaluation of service life of gear, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 38, 2531-2545, (1995).

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620381504

Google Scholar