A Simulation-Based Methodology for Lot-Size Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the process of lot size optimization, various factors such as machine capability and parts assembly lead time need to be considered. Within small batch and multi-items production environment, kitting parts entering to assembly systems in time may valid shorten product manufacturing period, and reduce the quantity of work-in-process (WIP). This paper built up a mathematical model with the objective function of reducing set up costs, shortening cycle of part production and reducing WIP and with constraints of machine capabilities, part process planning and kitting requirement. An object-oriented simulation model is established to control the behavior of logistics objects to meet the target functions through rules aggregation and constraints at the control points, resulting in an optimal production result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 392-394)

Pages:

866-872

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Drexl and A. Kimms: European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 99, (1997), pp.221-235.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Maes and V. Wassenhove: Journal of the Opterational Research Society, Vol. 39 (1988), pp.991-1004.

Google Scholar

[3] S.J. Choi and S.T. Enns: Int.J. Production Economics, Vol. 91 (2004), pp.47-62.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Brander, E. Levén and A. Segerstedt: Int.J. Production Economics, Vol. 93-94 (2005), pp.375-386.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Bomberger: Management Science, Vol. 12 (1966) No. 11, pp.778-784.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Segerstedt: Int.J. Production Economics, Vol. 59 (1999), pp.469-475.

Google Scholar

[7] J.F. Chang, Y.X. Zhong and Z.D. Han: J. Tsinghua Univ. (Sci&Tech), Vol. 44 (2004) No. 5, pp.605-608 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] M. Kämpf and P. Köchel: Int.J. Production Economics, Vol. 104 (2006), pp.191-200.

Google Scholar