Water Repellent Treatment on Lime/Lime-Fly Ash/Lime-Cement Mortar with and without Carbonation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Water repellent treatment (WRT) has proved to be effective to prevent porous materials from water penetration and consequently can improve the durability of structures. In this contribution, three types of mortar, which are pre-carbonated and non-carbonated, had been water repellent treated by silane gel with usage of 400 g/m2, to investigate into the influence of WRT on carbonated and non-carbonated mortar. Results indicate that carbonation reaction increased the compressive strength of all three types of mortar. Silane gel penetrated to a comparatively higher depth for the carbonated mortar. WRT reduced the absorbed water and capillary absorption coefficient greatly, both for non-carbonated mortar to 2 % ~ 7 % and for carbonated mortar to 22 % ~ 66 %, compared with non-treated ones. WRT is still a feasible method for porous materials with some carbonation to prevent from water penetration. However, the efficiency of WRT on reducing capillary absorption became much lower compared with the non-carbonated mortar. Capillary absorption curves of non-WRT mortar, both carbonated and non-carbonated, could be well fitted by a hyperbolic function of square root of time. For the treated mortar, the absorption curves could be described as a linear equation before carbonation, but an exponential function when the mortar carbonated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 400-402)

Pages:

145-150

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Vries, R.B. Polder and H. Borsje: Durability of hydrophobic treatment of concrete, in Proceedings of Hydrophobe II, Zürich, Aedificatio Publishers, (1998), pp.77-90.

Google Scholar

[2] S.J. Meier and M.F. Bäuml: Internal impregnation of concrete by means of silanes, Restoration of Buildings and Monuments. 12(1) (2006), pp.43-52.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2006-6022

Google Scholar

[3] J. Vries and R. Polder: Hydrophobic treatment of concrete, Construction and Building Materials. 11 (1997), pp.259-265.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(97)00046-9

Google Scholar

[4] F.H. Wittmann, T.J. Zhao and H.Y. Zhan: Establishment of an effective chloride barrier by water repellent impregnation, in Proceedings of an International Workshop on Durability of Reinforced Concrete under Combined Mechanical and Climatic Loads, Aedificatio Publisher, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Basheer, D.J. Cleland and A.E. Long: Protection provided by surface treatments against chloride induced corrosion, Materials and Structures. 31(1998), pp.459-464.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02480469

Google Scholar

[6] F.H. Wittmann: Protective coatings with water repellent agents, in Proceedings of Hydrophobe II, Zürich, Aedificatio Publishers, (1998), pp.107-118.

Google Scholar

[7] J.G. Dai, Y. Akira, H. Yokota and F.H. Wittmann: Various surface impregnation treatments of pre-conditioned concrete subjected to seawater immersion test, Restoration of Buildings and Monuments. 13(4) (2007), pp.1-12.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2007-6141

Google Scholar

[8] Test Methods of Long Term Performances and Its Durability for Normal Concrete, China (GBJ 82-85).

Google Scholar

[9] F.H. Wittmann, Y.Z. Xian and T.J. Zhao: Drying and Shrinkage of integral water repellent concrete, Restoration of Buildings and Monuments. 12(3) (2006), pp.229-242.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2006-6053

Google Scholar