Preparation and Performance of Sulfate Resistance Cement-Based Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

To discuss prevention of sulfate attack, especially thaumasite form of sulfate attack (TSA), sulfate resistance cement based material (SRM) were designed and prepared, and properties of which were investigated systematically. Micro-analytical techniques were introduced to identify erosion substances especially thaumasite, namely Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer(EDS). Results show that SRM have better sulfate resistance, as well as TSA resistance, when exposed to aggressive environment with 33800 ppm mass concentration of SO42- in magnesium sulfate solution at 5°C±2°C. When immersed in magnesium sulfate solution for 40 weeks, compressive strength and tensile strength of SRM are still higher than their initial, and those of control specimen are lower by 33.7%, 36.5% compared to its initial. Surface erosion substances of SRM named S1 are ettringite and gypsum, while those of control specimen are ettringite, gypsum, thaumasite and brucite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 400-402)

Pages:

195-201

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Collepardi M. Thaumasite formation and deterioration in historic buildings. Cem. Concr. Res. Vol. 21 (1999), pp.147-154.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(98)00044-4

Google Scholar

[2] GAO Xiaojian, MA Baoguo, ZHAO Zhiman. On attack product and corrosion mechanism of hydraulic concrete after long-term exposure to natural environment in western China. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, Vol. 25 (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] Hu Mingyu, Tang Mingshu, Long Fumei. The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in concrete of Yongan Dam . Concrete, Vol. 181 (2004), pp.5-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.04.005

Google Scholar

[4] Edge RA, Taylor HFW. Crystal structure of thaumasite [Ca3Si(OH)6·12H2O]SO4CO3. Acta Cryst B, Vol. 27 (1971), pp.594-601.

DOI: 10.1107/s0567740871002619

Google Scholar

[5] Al-Amoudi OSB, Maslehuddin M, Sssdi MM. Effect of magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate on the surability performance of plain and blended cements. ACI Mater. J. Vol. 92 (1995), pp.15-24.

DOI: 10.14359/1173

Google Scholar

[6] China Civil Engineering Society, Durability Design and Construction of Concrete Structures . Bei Jing: China Architecture & Building Press, (2004), pp.40-41.

Google Scholar

[7] N.J. Crammond, The thaumasite form of sulphate attack in the UK. Cem. Concr. Compos, Vol. 25 (2003), pp.809-818.

Google Scholar

[8] S.A. Hartshorn, J.H. Sharp, R.N. Swamy. The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in Portland-limestone cement mortars stored in magnesium sulfate solution Cem. Concr. Compos. Vol. 24 (2003), pp.351-359.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(01)00087-7

Google Scholar

[9] S. Kohle, D. Heinz, L. Urbonas. Effect of ettringite on thaumasite formation[J]. Cem. and Concr. Res. Vol. 36 (2006), pp.697-706.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.11.006

Google Scholar