Modeling Cyclic Behavior of Reinforcing Steel: Relevance in Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

In nonlinear dynamic analyses of RC structures based on fiber-based discretization of member cross-sections, the constitutive model used to represent the cyclic behavior of reinforcing steel typically plays a significant role in controlling the structural response especially for nonductile systems. The accuracy of a fiber-section model is almost entirely dependent on the ability of both the concrete and reinforcing steel constitutive material models to represent the overall inelastic behavior of the member. This paper describes observations related to the fundamental properties of reinforcing steel such as buckling, hardening, diminishing yield plateau and growth of curvature, Bauschinger effect, and low-cycle fatigue and strength degradation that are relevant to the overall task of developing an accurate material model for use in seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 400-402)

Pages:

301-309

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.B. Mander, M.J.N. Priestley and R. Park: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 114 (1988), pp.1804-1826.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Hoshikuma, K. Kawashima, K. Nagaya and A.W. Taylor: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123 (1997), pp.624-633.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Restrepo-Posada, L. Dodd, R. Park and N. Cooke: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 120 (1994), pp.3178-3196.

Google Scholar

[4] L.L. Dodd and N. Cooke: The dynamic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge piers subjected to New Zealand seismicity, Research Report 92-04 (University of Canterbury, New Zealand 1992).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Seyed-Ranjbari: Further Development, Multiaxial Formulation, and Implementation of the Bounding Surface Plasticity Model for Metals, Ph.D. Dissertation (University of California at Davis, USA 1986).

Google Scholar

[6] S-Y. Ma, V. Bertero and E. Popov: Experimental and Analytical Studies on the Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular and T-Beams, Report No. EERC 76-2 (University of California at Berkeley, USA 1976).

Google Scholar

[7] L. F. Jr. Coffin: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 76 (1954), pp.931-950.

Google Scholar

[8] L. F. Jr. Coffin: Journal of Materials, Vol. 6 (1971), pp.388-402.

Google Scholar

[9] S. S. Manson: Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 5 (1965), pp.193-226.

Google Scholar

[10] M. A. Miner: Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 12 (1945), A159-A164.

Google Scholar

[11] S. K. Kunnath, Y.A. Heo and J. F. Mohle: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE (in press).

Google Scholar

[12] R. Dhakal and K. Maekawa: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 128 (2002), pp.1139-1147.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Monti and C. Nuti: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 118 (1992), pp.3268-3284.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Rodriguez, J. Botero and J. Villa: Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125 (1999), pp.605-612.

Google Scholar