Fatigue and Fracture Behaviour of Closed Cell Aluminium Foam

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aluminium foam represents a new class of materials characterized by a large variability due to its porous structure. A simple and easy-to-use indicator of foam inhomogeneities is represented by apparent density, but this parameter does not give indications about differences existing in structural stiffness. To overcome this limit, the variability of natural frequency has been considered in this work in the case of commercial closed-cell aluminium foam. Moreover, fatigue and fracture properties of aluminium foam are not well studied. In this work standard three-point bend specimens SE(B) have been used to determine critical Crack-Tip Opening Displacement. The pre-crack phase, consisting in the application of appropriate fatigue load, has been monitored through modal analysis. Experimental results confirm the possibility of using this technique also in the initial step of fatigue failure process to quantify the amount of fatigue damage induced by repeated loads.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 452-453)

Pages:

373-376

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Lefebvre, J. Banhart, D.C. Dunand, Porous metals and metallic foams: current status and recent developments. Advanced Engineering Materials, 10(9) (2008), 775-787.

DOI: 10.1002/adem.200800241

Google Scholar

[2] U. Ramamurty, A. Paul, Variability in mechanical properties of a metal foam. Acta materialia, 52 (2004), 869-876.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021

Google Scholar

[3] L. Peroni, M Avalle, M. Peroni, The mechanical behaviour of aluminium foam structures in different loading conditions, Int. J. of Impact Engineering, 35 (2008), 644-658.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.007

Google Scholar

[4] C. Chen, A-M Harte, N.A. Fleck, The plastic collapse of sandwich beams with a metallic foam core, Int. J. of Mechanical Sciences, 43 (2001), 1483-1506.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(00)00069-2

Google Scholar

[5] J.F. Rakow, A.M. Waas, Size effects and the shear response of aluminium foam, Mechanics of Materials, 37 (2005), 69-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.12.002

Google Scholar

[6] T.J. Lu, J.M. Ong, Characterization of close-celled cellular aluminum alloys, J. of Materials Science, 36 (2001), 2773 - 2786.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Chen, N.A. Fleck, Size effects in the constrained deformation of metallic foams, J. of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 50 (2002), 955-977.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00128-4

Google Scholar

[8] B. Zettl, H. Mayer, S.E. Stanzl Tschegg, H.P. Degischer, Fatigue properties of aluminium foams at high numbers of cycles. Material Science and Engineering A, 292 (2000), 1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01033-9

Google Scholar

[9] A.M. Harte, N.A. Fleck, M.F. Ashby, Fatigue failure of an open cell and a closed cell aluminium alloy foam, Acta materialia, 47 (1999), 2511-2524.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(99)00097-x

Google Scholar

[10] C. Motz, R. Pippan, Fracture behaviour and fracture toughness of ductile closed-cell metallic foams, Acta Materialia, 50 (2002), 2013-(2033).

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00047-2

Google Scholar

[11] R.P. Onck, R. Van Merkerk, A. Raaijmakers, J.T.M. De Hosson, Fracture of open- and closed-cell metal foams, Journal of Material Science, 40 (2005), 5821-5828.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-4996-7

Google Scholar

[12] P.S. Liu, Tensile fracture behavior of foamed metallic materials, Material Science and Engineering A, 384 (2004), 352-354.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.06.038

Google Scholar

[13] V. Dattoma, N. I . Giannoccaro, A. Messina, R. Nobile, Prediction of residual fatigue life of aluminium foam through natural frequencies and damping shift, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure, 32 (2009), 601-616.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01367.x

Google Scholar