Electrostatic Tractions at Crack Faces Taking into Account Full Piezoelectric Field Coupling

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cracks in piezoelectric solids have been subject to fracture mechanical investigations for more than 30 years. In the early years of research, boundary conditions at crack faces have been adopted from pure mechanical systems assuming traction free boundaries. From the electrostatic point of view, cracks have been assumed to be either free of surface charge or fully permeable. Later, limited permeable crack boundary conditions have become popular among the community, however still assuming traction-free crack faces. Recently, the theoretical framework has been extended including electrostatically induced mechanical tractions into crack models yielding a significant crack closure effect. However, these models are still simple neglecting e.g. piezoelectric field coupling. As one consequence, the tractions do not depend on the direction of the electric field with respect to the direction of material polarization. Here, an extended model is presented, entirely accounting for the piezoelectric coupling effect. In this case, the crack closure effect depends on the electric field direction. Additionally, the model yields a new shear effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 452-453)

Pages:

681-684

Citation:

Online since:

November 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.E. Pak: Journal of Applied Mechanics Vol. 57 (1990), pp.647-653.

Google Scholar

[2] V. Z. Parton: Acta Astronautica Vol. 3 (1976), pp.671-683.

Google Scholar

[3] R.M. McMeeking: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 64 (1999), pp.217-244.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Wippler, A. Ricoeur, M. Kuna: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 71 (2004), pp.2567-2587.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.03.003

Google Scholar

[5] R.M. McMeeking: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics (ZAMP) Vol. 40 (1989), pp.615-627.

Google Scholar

[6] T.H. Hao, Z.Y. Shen: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 47 (1994), pp.793-802.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Ricoeur, M. Enderlein, M. Kuna: Archive of Applied Mechanics Vol. 74 (2005), pp.536-549.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Kemmer, H. Balke, in: GAMM 98 (Short Communications in Mathematics and Mechanics, ZAMM), 79, pp.509-510, (1999).

Google Scholar

[9] C.M. Landis, R.M. McMeeking, in: Proceedings of SPIE, 3992, pp.176-184, (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] C.M. Landis: Int. J. Solids Structures Vol. 41 (2004), pp.6291-6315.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Ricoeur, M. Kuna: Mechanics Research Communications Vol. 36 (2009), pp.330-335.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Ricoeur, M. Kuna: International Journal of Fracture Vol. 157 (2009), 3-12.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Ricoeur: Theoretische Untersuchungen zum Bruchverhalten ferroelektrischer Keramiken bei elektromechanischer Beanspruchung (Freiberger Forschungshefte, B 340, 2007).

Google Scholar