The Study of Risk Caused by Personnel Change of Organs and Institutions

Abstract:

This paper has studied the impact of personnel changes within the organs and institutions, proposed a risk cost function and a personnel-change impact function. By establishing a risk cost model which will show the relationship between the changes in personnel and the risk of the changes, what’s more, bring forward an N-order open-stack model which can provide an effective method to research the personnel changes in organs quantitatively, the author finally gave out a unified dual-drive model dealing with the personnel changes in organs and institutions and proved it effective with the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Group of simulation modeling as well as the necessity to monitor and control the changes in personnel.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 460-461)
• Pages: 123-129
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.460-461.123
• Online since: January 2011
• Authors: Li Zhao Liu, Yuan Tao, Ying Wang, Mao Qing Li
• Keywords: Dual-Drive Model, N-Order Open-Stack Model, Personnel System, Risk Cost Model

References

[1] Choi Hyun-Ho, Cho Hyo-Nam, Seo J.W. Risk Assessment Methodology for underground Construction Projects . Journal of construction engineering and management, ASCE. 2004, 130(2): 258-272.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2004)130:2(258)

[2] Kozlowski R T, Mathewson S B. A primer on catastrophe model-ing [J] . Journal of Insurance Regulation, 1997, 15 (3): 322.

[3] Grossi P. Quantifying the uncertainty in seismic risk and loss esti-mation [D] . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Departmentof Systems Engineering, (2000).

[4] Gan X, Sethi S, Yan H. Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk-averse retailer [J] . Production and Operations Management. 2005, 14: 80—89.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00011.x

[5] Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions . Journal of Banking & Finance. 2002, 26: 1443 1471.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4266(02)00271-6

[6] Agrawal, V, S. Seshadri. Effect of Risk Aversion on Pricing and Order Quantity Decisions [J] . Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Journal. 2000, 410-423.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.2.4.410.12339

[7] Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, Health D. Coherent measures of risk . Mathematical Finance. 1999, 9: 203~228.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9965.00068

[8] Tomlin B, Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks[J] . Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2005, 7 (1) : 37—57.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.1040.0063

[9] Rolski T, Schmidli H, Schmidt V. Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance [M] . New York: Wiley&Sons, (1999).

[10] DONG Hua, ZHAO Xiang-hua. Ruin problems for a Phase-type risk precess [J] . Journal of Qufu Normal University: Natural Science, 2004, 30 (2): 4-8.

[11] Yuen K C, Guo J Y, Wu X Y. On a correlated aggregate model with Poisson and Erlang risk processes [J] . Mathematics and Eco-nomics. 2002, 31: 205-214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6687(02)00150-6

[12] Yuen K C, Guo J Y, Wu X Y. On a correlated aggregate claims model with Poisson and Erlang risk processes [J] . Mathematics and Economics. 2002, 31: 205-214.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6687(02)00150-6

[13] Furrer H J, Schmidli H. Exponential inequalities for rum probablitiesities of risk process perturbed by diffusion [J] . Mathematics and Economics, 1994, (15): 23-36.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6687(94)00017-4

[14] Yin C C. Ruin problems for Erlangrisk processes [M] . (2002).

[15] Grandell J. Aspects of Risk Theory [M] . New York: Springer-Verlag, (1991).

[16] Lipton J, Galbraith H, Burger J, et al. A Paradigm for Ecological Risk Assessment . Environmental Management, 1993, (17) : 1-5.

[17] Hunsaker CT, Grahm RL, Suter GW, et al. Assessing Ecological Risk on a Regional Scale . Environmental Management, 1990, (14) : 325-332.

[18] USEPA. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment [Z] . FRL2601122. (1998).

[19] Stahl R G, Guiseppi-Elie A, Bingman T S. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of its risk assessment principles and practices: A brief perspective from the regulated community[J] . Integr Environ Assess Manag, 2005, (1) : 86-92.

DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-018.1

[20] Hope B K. Performing spatially-and temporally-explicit ecological exposure assessments involving multiple stressors [J] . Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 2005, (11): 539-565.

DOI: 10.1080/10807030590949645

[21] Zakikhani M, Brandon D L, Dortch M S, et al. Demonstration applications of ARAMS for aquatic and terrestrial ecological risk assessment[R] . ERDC/ELTR-06-1. Vicksburg, Mississippi: Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, (2006).

[22] Dearfield K L, Bender E S, Kravitz M, et al. Ecological risk assessment issues identified during the U S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of risk assessment practices[J] . Integr Environ Assess Manag, 2005, (1) : 73-76.

DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-023.1

[23] DeMott R P, Balaraman A, Sorensen M T. The future direction of ecological risk assessment in the United States: Reflecting on the U S. Environmental Protection Agency'sExamination of risk assessment practices and principles[J] . Integr Environ Assess Manag, 2005, (1) : 77-82.

DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2004a-024.1

[24] USEPA. An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices[R] . EPA/100/B-04/001. Washington, DC: Office of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2004).

[25] Luo Xiao; Wang Hongwei and Xiao RenbinInstitute of Systems Engineering; HUST;. The Recognition of Decision Support Systems. ，Systems Engineering and Electronics. 1993. vol 5.