Particle Swarm Optimization Using Various Inertia Factor Variants

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an alternative and efficient method for solving the optimal control of manufacturing systems. Three different inertia factor, a constant inertia factor (CIF), time-varying inertia factor (TVIF), and global-local best inertia factor (GLbestIF), are considered with the particle swarm optimization(PSO) algorithm to analyze the impact of inertia factor on the performance of PSO algorithm. The PSO algorithm is simulated individually with the three inertia factor separately to compute the optimal control of the manufacturing system, and it is observed that the PSO with the proposed inertia factor yields better resultin terms of both optimal solution and faster convergence. Several statistical analyses are carried out from which can be concluded that the proposed method is superior to all the other methods considered in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 460-461)

Pages:

54-59

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1998, p.1942–(1948).

Google Scholar

[2] K. E Parsopoulos, V. P. Plagianakos, G. D. Magoulas and M. N. Vrahatis, Objective function 'stretching' to alleviate convergence to local minima, Nonlinear Analysis TMA 47, 2001, p.3419–3424.

DOI: 10.1016/s0362-546x(01)00457-6

Google Scholar

[3] R. C. Eberhart and Y. Shi, Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization, , in Proc. 7th Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1998, p.69–73.

Google Scholar

[4] R. C. Eberhart, J. Kennedy, and P. Simpson, Computational Intelligence PC Tools, Academic Press, Massachusetts, (1996).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kennedy, The particle swarm: social adaptation of knowledge, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (Indianapolis, Indiana), IEEE Service Center, New Jersey, 1997, p.303–308.

DOI: 10.1109/icec.1997.592326

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, A modified particle swarm optimizer, in Proc. Congr. Evol. Comput, 1998, p.69–73.

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Michalewicz, Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] M. Gen and R. Cheng, Genetic Algorithms & Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] P. Zhang and C. G. Cassandras, An improved forward algorithm for optimal control of a class of hybrid systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 47 (2002), no. 10, 1735–1739.

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2002.803549

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, Parameter selection in particle swarm optimization, Evolutionary Programming VII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1447, Springer, New York, 1998, p.591–600.

DOI: 10.1007/bfb0040810

Google Scholar