Observing Load Sequence Effects on Simulated and Experimental Fatigue Crack Growth Occurrence

Article Preview

Abstract:

Load cycle interactions can have a significant effect in fatigue crack growth (FCG) under variable amplitude loading. Studying of FCG and fatigue life calculation under spectrum loading is important for the reliable life prediction of engineering structures. Many models have been proposed, but yet no universal model exists. In this paper, a fatigue life predicted under various load spectra, using three different fatigue crack growth models namely, the Austen, modified Forman and NASGRO models. These models are validated with fatigue crack growth test data under various amplitude loadings. This application is performed with aids of three-point bend specimens of ASTM A533 steel material. The results clearly show the load sequences effect and the predicted results agree with some discrepancies between the different models as well as with the test data. Thus, neglecting the effect of cycle interaction in fatigue calculations under variable amplitude loading can lead to invalid life predictions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 462-463)

Pages:

489-494

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X.P. Huang, J.B. Zhang, W.C. Cui and J.X. Leng: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. Vol. 44 (2005), p.105.

Google Scholar

[2] NASA. Fatigue crack growth computer program. 'NASGRO, version 3. 0 –reference manual; (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] O.E. Wheeler: Journal of Trans ASME, Ser D, Vol. 94(1)(1972), p.181.

Google Scholar

[4] W. Elber: ASTM STP 486 (1972), p.230.

Google Scholar

[5] U.H. Padmadinata: PhD-thesis, Delft; (1990).

Google Scholar

[6] J.C. Newman Jr: ASTM STP 748 (1981), p.53.

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Pompetzki and T.H. Topper, D.L. Duquesnay and M.T. Yu: Journal of Test Evaluat Vol. 18(1) (1990), p.53.

Google Scholar

[8] B.L. Lee, K.S. Kim and K.M. Nam: Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 25 (2003), p.621.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Sadananda, A.K. Vasudevan, R.L. Holtz, and E.U. Lee: Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 21(1999), p. S233.

Google Scholar

[10] A.R.C. Murthy, G.S. Palani and N.R. Iyer: IE (I) J-CV Vol. 85 (2004), p.118.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Kujawski: Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 23(2001), p.733.

Google Scholar

[12] J.R. Mohanty, B.B. Verma and P.K. Ray: Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 31 (2009), p.425.

Google Scholar

[13] S.M. Beden, S. Abdullah, A.K. Ariffin and N.A. Al-Asady: Materials and Design Vol. 31 (2010, ) p.3449.

Google Scholar

[14] nCode User guide manual. ICE-FLOW cracks growth. V2. 0. (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] ASM Metals Handbook, Vol. 2, ASM International 10th Ed. (1990).

Google Scholar

[16] S. Kassim Al-Rubaie, K.L. Emerson, L. Barroso, B. Godefroid. Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. A486 (2008), p.585.

Google Scholar