Clinical Success of IPS Empress II Inlays/Onlays

Abstract:

For the dental restorations, ceramic materials have increasing popularities because of their biocompatibility and superior esthetics. IPS Empress which is leucite-reinforced glass ceramic is one of the most popular ceramics. IPS Empress II was developed in following years which is stronger than IPS Empress. In the dental applications some problems occur about ceramic restorations. Hence,this study was performed to examine the six-year clinical performance of IPS Empress II ceramic onlay and inlay restorations.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 493-494)
• Pages: 620-625
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.620
• Online since: October 2011
• Authors: Funda Yanıkoğlu, Gürol Özyöney, Nuran Özyöney, Dilek Tağtekin, Hesna Öveçoğlu, Mahir Günday
• Keywords: Clinical Performance of IPS Empress, Dental Restorations, IPS Empress

References

[1] N. Katsube, Clinical study on posterior esthetic machinable ceramic restorations, Japan J Conserv Dent 40 (1997) 445-88.

[2] R. Frankenberger, U. Lohbauer, R. Schaible, S. Nikolaenko, M. Naumann, Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch- and -rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements, Dent Mater 24 (2008) 185-191.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003

[3] S. D Heintze, Bridges made of all-ceramic material (IPS Empress II), indication, clinic aspects, prognosis, Ivoclar Vivadent Report, 1998, No: 12.

[4] M. Bergman, The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review, Aust Dent J 44 (1999) 3.

[5] I. Krejci, D. Krejci, F. Lutz, Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1. 5 years, Quintessence Int 23(1992) 181-6.

[6] I. Krejci, F. Lutz, M. Reimer, J. L Heinzmann, Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists and luting cements, J Prosthet Dent 69 (1993) 425-30.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90192-q

[7] D. Gemalmaz, Ş. Ergin, Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns, J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 189-96.

[8] R. Frankenberger, A. Petschelt, N. Kramer, Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior, Oper Dent 25 (2000) 459-65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.009

[9] J. W Van Dijken, A. Ormin, A. L Olofsson, Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and auto-polymerizing resin composite cements, J Prosthet Dent 82 (1999) 529-35.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70051-x

[10] M. Fradeani, A. Aquilano, L. Bassein, Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years, J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 346-53.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70041-6