The Effect of Temperature, Strain Rate and Strain on the Induced Mechanical Properties of Biaxially Stretched PET

Article Preview

Abstract:

The study is focused on the effect of strain rate, temperature and stretch ratio on the room temperature mechanical properties of PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) following biaxial deformation. Specimens were biaxially stretched within a temperature range 80-110°C, a strain rate in the range 1-16/s and stretch ratio in the range 1-2.8. The tensile moduli of the stretched specimens were obtained using tensile testing. Results show that post-stretching room temperature modulus increases with decreasing temperature, increasing strain rate, and stretch ratio.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 504-506)

Pages:

1117-1122

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G.H. Menary, C.W. Tan, E.M.A. Harkin-Jones, C.G. Armstrong, P.J. Martin, Biaxial deformation and experimental study of PET at conditions applicable to stretch blow molding

DOI: 10.1002/pen.22134

Google Scholar

[2] British Standard, BS EN ISO 527-2:1996. Plastics- Determination of tensile properties- Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. 1996.

DOI: 10.3403/00921383u

Google Scholar

[3] Venkateswaran G, Cameron MR, Jabarin SA. Prediction of PET container properties using film data. Advance in Polymer Technology 1998; 17(3): 217.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2329(199823)17:3<217::aid-adv3>3.0.co;2-v

Google Scholar

[4] Huang B, Ito M, Kanamoto T. Deformation mechanism of amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) as a function of molecular weight and entanglements. Polymer 1994; 35(6): 1210.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90013-2

Google Scholar

[5] Chandran P, Jabarin SA. Biaxial orientation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Part 1: Nature of the stress-strain curves. Advance in Polymer Technology 1993; 12(2): 119.

DOI: 10.1002/adv.1993.060120202

Google Scholar

[6] Chandran P, Jabarin SA. Biaxial orientation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Part 2: The strain –hardening parameter. Advances in polymer technology 1993; 12(2): 133.

DOI: 10.1002/adv.1993.060120203

Google Scholar

[7] Chandran P, Jabarin SA. Biaxial orientation of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Part 3: Comparative structure and property changes resulting from simultaneous and sequential orientation. Advances in polymer technology 1993; 12(2): 153

DOI: 10.1002/adv.1993.060120204

Google Scholar

[8] Varma P, Lofgren EA, Jabarin SA. Properties and kinetics of thermally crystallized oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). II: Physical and optical properties. Polymer Engineering and Science 1998; 38(2): 245.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.10185

Google Scholar

[9] Chevalier L, Linhone C, Regnier G. Induced crystallinity during stretch–blow moulding process and its influence on mechanical strength of poly(ethylene terephthalate) bottles. Plastics, Rubber and Composites 1999; 28(8): 393.

DOI: 10.1179/146580199101540556

Google Scholar

[10] Venkateswaran G, Cameron MR, Jabarin SA. Prediction of PET container properties using film data. Advance in Polymer Technology 1998; 17(3): 217

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2329(199823)17:3<217::aid-adv3>3.0.co;2-v

Google Scholar