Pressure Pipe Damage: Numerical Estimation of Point Load Effect

Article Preview

Abstract:

The most relevant loading conditions for real polymer pipe systems are not only internal pressure, but also loading caused by sand embedding including bending or different kinds of point loads. It has been shown that service lifetime of buried pipes can be reduced especially due to stress concentration caused by external point loads. If the pipe is loaded locally the stress is concentrated here and a crack can initiate at this position or the existing crack can be affected by corresponding stress redistribution. In the paper the effect of the hard indenter, Poissons ratio, hoop stress level and pipe wall thickness on the crack shape was estimated using numerical simulations of the creep crack propagation based on finite element method. Relation between crack length and crack width was found and expressed by simple relationship. A deeper understanding of the point load effect in order to prevent unexpected failure of the pipelines is of paramount importance for pipeline design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 525-526)

Pages:

177-180

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Janson L.E., Plastic Pipes for Water Supply and Sewage Disposal, Borealis, Stockholm; (1999).

Google Scholar

[2] Pinter, G., Haager, M., Lang, W.G., Influence of nonylphenol–polyglycol–ether environments on the results of the full notch creep test, Polymer Testing, Vol. 26, Issue 6, pp.700-710, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.01.010

Google Scholar

[3] Farshad, M., Determination of the long-term hydrostatic strength of multilayer pipes, Polymer Testing, Vol. 24, Issue 8, pp.1041-1048, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.07.001

Google Scholar

[4] X. Lu, N. Brown, A test for slow crack growth failure in polyethylene under a constant load, Polymer Testing, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp.309-319, (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0142-9418(92)90025-7

Google Scholar

[5] Hutař, P., Ševčík, M., Náhlík, L., Pinter, G., Frank, A., Mitev, I., A numerical methodology for lifetime estimation of HDPE pressure pipes, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 78, Issue 17, pp.3049-3058, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.001

Google Scholar

[6] Watkins R.K., Anderson L. R., Structural Mechanics of Buried Pipes, CRC Press, Boca Raton, (2000).

Google Scholar

[7] Hessel, J., Minimum service-life of buried polyethylene pipes without sand-embedding. 3R international 40, Special Plastic Pipes, pp.4-12, (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] Schouwenaars R., et. al, Slow crack growth and failure induced by manufacturing defects in HDPE-tubes, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 14, pp.1124-1134, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.066

Google Scholar

[9] Anderson, T. L. Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[10] Branco, R., Antunes, F.,V., Finite element modeling and analysis of crack shape evolution in mode-I fatigue Middle Cracked Tension specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75, pp.3020-3037, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.012

Google Scholar

[11] Blümich, A., et al.: Mobile NMR for Analysis of Polyethylene Pipes. Acta Physica Polonica A. Vol. 108, pp.13-23. (2005).

DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.108.13

Google Scholar