Modeling of Damage and Failure of Dual Phase Steel in Nakajima Test

Jun He Lian; Peng Fei Liu; Sebastian Münstermann

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.525-526.69

Paper Titles

Effect of Surface Treatment on Creep Property of Jute Fiber Reinforced Green Composite under Environmental Temperature
p.53

Micro-Scale Cantilever Testing of Linear Elastic and Elastic-Plastic Materials
p.57

The Influence of the Epoxy Interlayer on the Assessment of Failure Conditions of Push-Out Test Specimens
p.61

Fracture and Damage Characterization of Natural Fiber Composites
p.65

Modeling of Damage and Failure of Dual Phase Steel in Nakajima Test
p.69

Micromechanical Modeling for the Evaluation of Elastic Moduli of Woven Composites
p.73

Characterization of Metal Magnetic Memory of Thermal Damage Correlated with Initial Cumulative Fatigue Damage for Laser Cladding Remanufacturing Technology
p.77

SEM In Situ Study on Pre-Corrosion and Fatigue Cracking Behavior of LY12CZ Aluminum Alloy
p.81

Analysis of Stress Intensity Factor for Cracked Flattened Brazilian Disk: Part I – Analysis Method and Pure Mode I Crack
p.85

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 525-526Modeling of Damage and Failure of Dual Phase Steel...

Modeling of Damage and Failure of Dual Phase Steel in Nakajima Test

Abstract:

For modern high strength steels, instead of metal instability, ductile damage triggered by the formation of microvoids or microcracks resulting from the complex material microstructure, has become the key factor responsible for the final failure in the forming process of such steels. The target of this study is to describe the initiation and evolution of damage in a dual-phase (DP) steel (DP600). By applying a newly proposed approach that is able to indicate the onset of damage in an engineering sense and quantify the subsequent damage evolution, to predict the forming limits for DP600 are predicted by simulating Nakajima test. Accordingly, two forming limit curves (FLC) are numerically computed to characterize two moments: when damage becomes pronounced and when the final failure is triggered by the accumulation of damage. Comparing with the conventional experimentally calibrated FLC at necking, the limit at crack initiation predicted by modeling gives a lower but defect-free forming boundary. The forming limit at final fracture is well captured by allowing the subsequent damage evolution to a critical value.