Finite Element Analysis of the Mechanical Behaviour of the Different Cemented Hip Femoral Prostheses

Article Preview

Abstract:

The designs of cemented hip femoral stems have an influence on both the quality of the metalbone cement contact and the failure rate of the cement mantle. Finite element stress technique has been used to optimize both design and material selection in load-bearing components in artificial hip joints based on the static load analysis, by selecting the peak load during the patient activity. In this study, two stem shapes (Ceraver Osteal and Charnley stems) for total hip arthoplasty (THA) were modelled. Static behaviour of these designed stem shapes were analyzed using commercial finite element analysis code ABAQUS. Linear elastic analysis is adapted; Von Mises stress and shear stress are the criterions that are of concern. Results show that, the stresses distribution in the femoral arthroplasty components depends on the material and design of the stem. In addition, the cement-bone and cement-stem interfaces seem to be crucial for the success of the hip replacement, hip prosthesis with Charnely stem induces the more stresses on the interfaces cement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 577-578)

Pages:

349-352

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Ramos and J.A. Simões: In vitro fatigue crack analysis of the Lubinus SPII cemented hip stem. Engineering Failure Analysis 16 (2009) 1294–1302.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.018

Google Scholar

[2] G. Lewis, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 38 (Fasc.2) (1997) 155–182.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Jasty et al: The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (1991) 551–558.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.73b4.2071634

Google Scholar

[4] J. Stolk et al: Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains inpre-clinical tests. Journal of Biomechanics (2002) 499–510.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00213-5

Google Scholar

[5] S. Gravius, et al: In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs. Journal of Biomechanics (2008) 2021–2028.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.041

Google Scholar

[6] Bergmann, G., 2001, "HIP98", Free University, Berlin, ISBN 3-9807848-0-0.

Google Scholar

[7] G.N. Duda et al: Influence of Muscle Forces on Femoral Strain Distribution. Journal of Biomechanics (1998), Vol. 31, pp.841-846.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00080-3

Google Scholar

[8] A. Rohlmann et al: Finite element analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. Journal of Biomechanics (1983) Vol 16, 727–742.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90082-9

Google Scholar