A Pilot Study Regarding the Biomechanical Behaviour of Endosteal Implants

Cristian Dobreci; Alexandru Petre; Matei Traistaru

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.587.372

Paper Titles

The Aesthetic Effect of All-Ceramic Pressed Crowns According to the Thickness and Color of the Materials Used - An In Vitro Study
p.349

A Retrospective Study on the Incidence of Chipping of Zirconia-Based Restorations
p.356

In Vitro Evaluation of New Dental Software for Shade Matching
p.360

Study of the Expansion Behaviour of Some Materials Used in the Dental Metal-Ceramic Technology
p.366

A Pilot Study Regarding the Biomechanical Behaviour of Endosteal Implants
p.372

Bioceramic and Fibrin Sealant in High Tibial Valgus Osteotomy: Prospective Clinical Study
p.381

Bioactive Titanium for Implants and Bone Substitutes
p.387

Synthesis of Controlateral Hip Fracture in Osteoporotic Patients – Prophylactic Treatment
p.391

Transfemoral Fixation in Soft Tissue Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions – Composite Versus Polymeric Implant Analysis
p.397

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 587A Pilot Study Regarding the Biomechanical...

A Pilot Study Regarding the Biomechanical Behaviour of Endosteal Implants

Abstract:

An endosteal implant is an alloplastic material surgically inserted into a residual bony ridge primarily as a prosthodontic foundation. Root form implants are the design most often used. Although many names have been applied, the 1988 National Institutes of Health consensus, statement on dental implants and the American Academy of Implant Dentistry recognized the term root form. Misch developed a generic language for endosteal implants in 1992. This language is presented in an order following the chronology of insertion to restoration. In formulating the terminology, five commonly used implant systems in the United States were referenced. Ten years later, the dramatic evolution in the implant market led to reconsideration of the terminology. At the moment, over 3000 different implant systems are on the market, but the comparative evaluation is not done by objective means.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 587)

Pages:

372-378

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.587.372

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2013

Authors:

Cristian Dobreci*, Alexandru Petre, Matei Traistaru

Keywords:

Biomechanics, Dental Implants, Dynamic Loading

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Stegaroiu R., Khraisad A., Nomura S., Miakava O., Influence of superstructure material on strain around an implant under two loading conditions, Int. J. of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 19 (5), 2004, 735-742.

Google Scholar

[2] Wiskot H.W., Resistence of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application, Int. Journal of Prosthodontics, 17 (6), 2004, 672-679.

Google Scholar

[3] Karl M., Static implant loading caused by as cast metal and ceramic veneered superstructures, Int. J. of Prosthetic Dentistry, 93 (4), 2005, 324-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.006

Google Scholar

[4] Quek E., Load fatigue performance of a single tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter, Int. J. of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 21(6), 2006, 929-936.

Google Scholar

[5] Gehrke P., Brauner J., Wolf D., Zirconium implant abutment fracture strenght and influence of cycling loading on retaining screw loosening, Quintessence International, 37 (7), 2006, 19-26.

Google Scholar

[6] Carl Mish, Dental Implant Prosthetics, Elsevier, (2006).

Google Scholar