Effect of Annealing Atmosphere on the Morphology of Copper Oxide Thin Films Deposited on TiO2 Substrates Prepared by Sol-Gel Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Copper oxide films were prepared via sol-gel like spin coating starting from methanolic solutions of cupric chloride onto the TiO2 substrates. Films were obtained by spin coating under room conditions (temperature, 25-30 °C) and were subsequently annealed at different temperatures (200-400 °C) in oxidizing (air) and inert (N2) atmospheres. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns showed crystalline phases, which were observed as a function of the annealing conditions. The film composition resulted single or multi-phasic depending on both temperature and atmosphere. The grain size of film was measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the surface roughness of thin films was characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The grain size of which was annealed in air at 300 °C was 30.39 nm with the surface roughness of 96.16 nm. The effects of annealing atmosphere on the structure and morphology of copper oxide thin films are reported.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 594-595)

Pages:

113-117

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Armelao, D. Barreca, M. Bertapelle, G. Bottaro, C. Sada, and E. Tondello, Thin Solid Films 442 (2003), p.48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(03)00940-4

Google Scholar

[2] V. Georgieva, A. Tanusevski, Fifth General Conference of the Balkan Physical Union, August 25-29 (2003), p.2311.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Serin, T. Serin, S. Horzum and Y. Celik, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20 (2005), p.398.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Richthofen, R. Domnic, R. Cremer and J. Fresenius, J. Anal. Chem. 358 (1997), p.312.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Y. Oral, E. Mensur, M. H. Aslan and E. Basaran, Materials Chemistry and Physics 83 (2004), p.140.

Google Scholar

[6] U. D. Lanke and M. Vedawyas, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B155 (1999), p.97.

Google Scholar

[7] K. H. Yoon, W. J. Choi and D. H. Kang, Thin Solid Films 372 (2000), p.250.

Google Scholar

[8] S. C. Ray, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 68 (2001), p.307.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Tang, Z. Chen, Z. Jia, L. Zhang and J. Li, Materials Letters 59 (2005), p.434.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Maruyama, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 56 (1998), p.85.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Gosh, D. K. Avasthi, P. Shah, V. Ganesan, A. Gupta, D. Sarangi, R. Bhattacharya and W. Assmann, Vacuum 57 (2000), p.377.

DOI: 10.1016/s0042-207x(00)00151-2

Google Scholar

[12] M. T. S. Nair, L. Guerrero, O. L. Arenas, and P. K. Nair, Appl. Surf. Sci., 150 (1999), p.143.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Al-Gaashani, S. Radiman, N. Tabet and A. R. Daud, J. Alloys and Compounds, 35 (2011), p.8761.

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Huda, and B. Ralph, Materials Characterization, 25 (1990), p.211.

Google Scholar

[15] Diwakar Chauhan, V. R. Satsangsi, Sahab Dass and Rohit Shrivastav, Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 (2006), p.709.

Google Scholar

[16] C. F. Tsang, J. Woo, materials Characterization 45 (2000), p.187.

Google Scholar