GA-Based Proactive-Reactive Scheduling Mechanism for a Flexible Job Shop Problem under Multi-Uncertainty

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article investigates the flexible job-shop scheduling problem (FJSP) with multi-uncertain. A proactive-reactive scheduling mechanism is put forward to against the fluctuating process time and equipment breakdowns. This mechanism consists of two stages, including proactive scheduling stage and reactive scheduling stage. In the proactive scheduling stage, the redundancy-based technique is used to generate robust baseline schedules; in the reactive scheduling stage, a reactive scheduling is adopted to rectify the predictive scheduling to adapt to the occurrence of machine failures. Based on this, an integrating algorithm is presented with the goal of the make span. Numerical experiments show that the proposed algorithm has a better performance than Genetic Algorithm (GA) on flexible job-shop scheduling problem under processing time uncertainty and the reactive scheduling algorithm can handle the equipment breakdown with little robustness lost.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

668-675

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Kim B: Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 16 (2013), p.214.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Boukouvala,V. Niotis, R. Ramachandran: Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 42 (2012), p.30.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Karnouskos, D. Savio, P. Spiess: Real-world service interaction with enterprise systems in dynamic manufacturing environments (Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Networked Manufacturing Enterprises Management. Springer London, 2010).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-119-6_14

Google Scholar

[4] D. Min, Y. Yih: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 206 (2010), p.642.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Qin, J. Zhang, Y. Sun: Computers in Industry, Vol. 64 (2013), p.694.

Google Scholar

[6] A.Y. Saber, G.K. Venayagamoorthy: Systems Journal, Vol. 6 (2012), p.103.

Google Scholar

[7] P.M. Verderame, C.A. Floudas: Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 49 (2010), p.4948.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Xia, B. Chen, J. Yue: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 184 (2008), p.63.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Herroelen, R. Leus: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42 (2004), p.1599.

Google Scholar

[10] Cui J, Engell S: Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 34 (2010), p.598.

Google Scholar

[11] P.M. Swamidass, W.T. Newell: Management Science, Vol. 33 (1987), p.509.

Google Scholar

[12] N. Policella: AI Communications, Vol. 18 (2005), p.165.

Google Scholar

[13] W. Herroelen, R. Leus: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42 (2004), p.1599.

Google Scholar

[14] X. Tang, K. Li, G. Liao: Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 27 (2011), p.1083.

Google Scholar

[15] L. Nie, L. Gao, P. Li: Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 66 (2013), p.389.

Google Scholar

[16] F. Deblaere, E. Demeulemeester, W. Herroelen: Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 38 (2011), p.63.

Google Scholar

[17] M.C. Gomes, A.P. Barbosa-Póvoa, A.Q. Novais: International Journal of Production Research (ahead-of-print, 2013), p.1.

Google Scholar

[18] M.B. Abello, Z. Michalewicz, L.T. Bui: A reactive-proactive approach for solving dynamic scheduling with time-varying number of tasks (Evolutionary Computation, 2012 IEEE Congress on).

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2012.6256484

Google Scholar

[19] P. Lou, Q. Liu, Z. Zhou: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 59 (2012), p.311.

Google Scholar

[20] M.A. Aloulou, M.C. Portmann: An efficient proactive-reactive scheduling approach to hedge against shop floor disturbances (Multidisciplinary scheduling: theory and applications. Springer US, 2005).

DOI: 10.1007/0-387-27744-7_11

Google Scholar