Design of a Spool Valve Overlap Value Pneumatic Measuring System Based on Constant Pressure Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

Pressure type pneumatic measuring is the most wildly used method in overlap value testing, which depends strongly on the constant pressure of gas supplying. However,control of pressureisrarely done before.This paper presentsa design of a new overlap value measuring system with pressure control sub-system, mechanical platformand a program-controlled sub-system. A hybrid controller is developed combined with fuzzyself-adjusting PID and time-optimal control. The final version of this controller is a computationally efficient analytic scheme suitable for implementation in thereal-time closed-loop pressure digitalcontrol. At last, the system control software developed on LabVIEW is briefly introduced.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

482-489

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X.D. Pan, G.L. Wang and D.X. Shao etc.: Journal of Vibration.Measurement&Diagnosis, Vol. 29(2009) No. 4, pp.392-397. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] G.L. Wang, X.D. Pan and Z. Sh. Lu: Aviation Precision Manufacture Technology, Vol. 41(2005) No. 6, pp.21-23. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] X.D. Pan: Study on Servovalve spool Valve Overlap Value Hydraulic Measuring System and the Key Technics of the System( Ph.D., Harbin Institute of Technology, China 2008 ), p.59.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.H. Lu: Industrial Instrumentation & Automation, Vol1 (1998), pp.57-62. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] H. Liu: Research on Pneumatic Pressure Source with High Precision M.S. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China 2004), pp.24-34.

Google Scholar

[6] Pratumsuwan P, Thongchai S, Tansriwong S.: Energy Research Journal, Vol1 (2010), No. 2, p.62.

Google Scholar

[7] F.L. Feng: Measurement & Control Technology, Vol6 (2008), pp.47-49.

Google Scholar